Research on the characteristics and influencing factors of workplace violence in a specialized hospital and its affiliated medical consortium members
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20241011-00464
- VernacularTitle:某专科医院及其医联体工作场所暴力现况及影响因素研究
- Author:
Xinxin FANG
1
;
Min ZHANG
1
;
Yiming HUANG
1
;
Fuyuan WANG
1
;
Yuting TANG
1
;
Chuning HE
1
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院群医学及公共卫生学院,北京 100730
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Violence;
Workplace;
Medical consortium;
Healthcare workers;
Intervention measure;
Coping style
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2025;43(11):818-824
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the characteristics, influencing factors, consequences, coping strategies, and preventive measures of workplace violence in medical consortiums.Methods:Medical professionals from a specialized hospital in South China and its consortium members (2 primary-level, 1 secondary-level, and 1 tertiary-level hospitals) were surveyed in December 2022 and July 2023. Quantitative research included 1013 participants, while qualitative research involved 35 participants. Workplace violence was assessed using the "National Case Study Tool for Workplace Violence in Healthcare Institutions-Survey Questionnaire", with qualitative analysis conducted through semi-structured interviews. Inter-group comparisons employed chi-square tests or Fisher's exact probability test, with logistic regression models for bivariate analysis.Results:The overall incidence rates of violence, psychological violence, and physical violence in this medical consortium were 31.7% (321/1, 013) , 30.6% (310/1, 013) , and 3.3% (33/1, 013) , respectively. Specifically, the overall violence rates in Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 hospitals were 22.7% (41/181) , 27.4% (43/157) , and 35.1% (237/675) . The physical violence rates were 1.1% (2/181) , 10.2% (16/157) , and 2.2% (15/675) , respectively. The psychological violence rates stood at 22.7% (41/181) , 24.8% (39/157) , and 34.1% (230/675) . The total violence in tertiary hospitals was significantly higher than that in tertiary hospitals ( F=10.10, P=0.002) , and the incidence of psychological violence in tertiary hospitals was significantly higher than that in tertiary hospitals ( Flevel 1 vs level 3=8.61, P=0.003; Flevel 2 vs level 3=4.96, P=0.026) , incidence of verbal insults ( Flevel 1 vs level 3=8.25, P=0.004; Flevel 2 vs level 3=6.36, P= 0.012) was significantly higher than that of level 1 and level 2 hospitals. The incidence of physical violence in secondary hospitals was significantly higher than that of other two-level hospitals ( P<0.001) . Compared with other types of violence, the incidence of verbal insults is highest in hospitals at all levels. Higher anxiety about violence was a risk factor for psychological violence in hospitals at all levels ( Flevel1 hospital=15.44, P=0.004; Flevel2 hospital=22.87, P<0.001; Flevel3 hospital=84.12, P<0.001) . Health workers in all three levels of hospitals has a high level of approval of existing workplace violence interventions. The main causes of workplace violence were poor communication between doctors and patients (13.2%) , service attitude problems (12.5%) and patient illness (16.9%) . Conclusion:Workplace violence remains prevalent within this medical consortium. Targeted measures should be implemented based on hospital size, functions, and patient demographics.