Comparison of the efficacy of different minimally invasive surgical approaches for lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20250612-00637
- VernacularTitle:不同微创手术方式治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效的网状Meta分析
- Author:
Kai LIU
1
;
Lei WANG
1
;
Haoran GAO
1
;
Fu SUN
1
Author Information
1. 西安医学院第一附属医院骨科，西安710000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Intervertebral disc herniation;
Surgical procedures, minimally invasive;
Efficacy;
Randomized controlled trial
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2025;24(8):992-1001
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of different minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Methods:This study was a network meta-analysis (NMA). Databases the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from database inception to December 22, 2024 were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for LDH were retrieved using a combination of subject headings and free-text terms. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The NMA was conducted within a Bayesian framework. Direct and indirect comparisons among the MIS approaches were presented using league tabulations. Cumulative ranking probability plots were generated using the ggplot2 package in R software. Treatment efficacy outcomes were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, ranging from 0 to 100%; a SUCRA value closer to 100% indicates a more favorable intervention.Results:A total of 15 RCTs were finally included. The interventions assessed were percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD), microendoscopic discectomy (MED), unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), transforaminal discectomy (TD), and microscopic discectomy (MD). Length of hospital stay (reported in 13 studies, n=1 414): ranked from the shortest to the longest were PETD, PEID, TD, MD, UBE, MED (SUCRA: 82.03%, 78.37%, 72.06%, 43.86%, 11.51%, 12.16%). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3 months postoperatively (reported in 10 studies, n=1 004): ranked from the lowest to the highest ODI were MD, UBE, PEID, TD, MED, PETD (SUCRA: 88.33%, 50.56%, 50.36%, 47.59%, 32.13%, 31.03%). ODI at 1 year postoperatively (reported in 10 studies, n=960): ranked from the lowest to the highest were PEID, MD, TD, MED, PETD, UBE (SUCRA: 74.03%, 66.56%, 43.22%, 42.63%, 40.75%, 32.80%). Surgical complications (reported in 12 studies, n=1 412): ranked from the lowest to the highest complication rate were MD, TD, UBE, PETD, PEID, MED (SUCRA: 81.60%, 76.55%, 72.86%, 24.43%, 23.41%, 20.97%). Conclusions:The efficacy of different MIS approaches for LDH varies. PETD is associated with the shortest postoperative hospital stay, MD is associated with the lowest ODI at 3 months and the lowest complication rate, PEID is associated with the lowest ODI at 1 year postoperatively.
