Prognostic value of the FS-15 frailty score in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20250303-00107
- VernacularTitle:FS-15衰弱评分在骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的预后评估价值研究
- Author:
Xin WANG
1
;
Tiejun QIN
;
Zefeng XU
;
Shiqiang QU
;
Bing LI
;
Lijuan PAN
;
Qingyan GAO
;
Meng JIAO
;
Yue ZHONG
;
Binhan JIANG
;
Linlin LIU
;
Jinying ZHAO
;
Wenjun XIE
;
Zhijian XIAO
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院血液病医院（中国医学科学院血液学研究所），血液与健康全国重点实验室，国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心，细胞生态海河实验室，天津 300020
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Myelodysplastic syndrome;
Frail;
Prognosis;
IPSS-M;
IPSS-R
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hematology
2025;46(9):806-814
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To identify the prognostic value of the Revised 15-item Myelodysplastic Syndrome-specific frailty scale (FS-15) in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) .Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 812 patients with newly diagnosed MDS admitted to the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College from August 2016 to June 2023. Patients were assessed using the FS-15 and subsequently categorized into frail and non-frail groups. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, as well as overall survival (OS), were compared between these groups.Results:① The median patient age was 55 years ( IQR 45–64), with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (95% CI: 20.2–24.9) and a median OS of 43.3 months (95% CI: 36.8–49.8). The median FS-15 score was 0.42, with a cutoff value of 0.44. Male patients demonstrated higher median FS-15 scores than female patients (0.42 vs 0.38, P=0.006). In both the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R; P=0.001) and Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M; P=0.014) stratifications, FS-15 scores were significantly higher in the very high-risk group compared with the very low-risk group. ② The median OS was 54.7 months (95% CI: 47.5–NA) and 31.5 months (95% CI: 22.9–41.0) in the nonfrail ( n=452) and frail groups ( n=360), respectively ( P<0.001). The 3-year OS rates were (63.2 ± 3.2) % and (46.4 ± 3.6) % for the non-frail and frail groups, with 5-year OS rates of (49.9 ± 4.7) % and (32.0 ± 4.3) %, respectively ( P<0.001). ③Subgroup analysis revealed that nonfrail patients demonstrated significantly higher 3-year OS rates than frail patients in both the IPSS-M low-risk and very high-risk groups (all P<0.05). Similarly, nonfrail patients demonstrated superior 3-year OS rates compared with frail patients in the IPSS-R very low-risk, low-risk, and high-risk groups (all P<0.05). ④Among patients receiving hypomethylating agent therapy, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the non-frail group than in the frail group (86.7% vs 64.6%, P=0.007). Moreover, the frail group experienced higher rates of treatment-related adverse events, including febrile neutropenia (67.1% vs 47.4%, P=0.016) and liver function abnormalities (30.0% vs 14.5%, P=0.023), compared with the non-frail group. Conclusion:The FS-15 frailty score is a feasible and effective tool for assessing frailty in patients newly diagnosed with MDS in China and serves as a valuable prognostic indicator.
