Application of 18F-FDG PET/MR and its derived parameters in the diagnosis and staging of bladder cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20250204-00027
- VernacularTitle:18F－FDG PET/MR及其衍生参数在膀胱癌诊断与分期中的应用
- Author:
Qinqin YOU
1
;
Fei YU
;
Rushuai LI
;
Fengjiao YANG
;
Shuyue AI
;
Jun TANG
;
Feng WANG
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属南京医院、南京市第一医院核医学科，南京 210006
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Urinary bladder neoplasms;
Positron-emission tomography;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2025;45(7):405-410
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application of 18F-FDG PET/MR and its derived parameters in the diagnosis and staging of bladder cancer. Methods:Forty patients (32 males, 8 females; age (66.8±11.2) years) with suspected bladder cancer between December 2019 and March 2022 were retrospectively included and underwent 18F-FDG PET/MR in Nanjing First Hospital. Parameters including SUV max, SUV mean, maximum tumor diameter and mean of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC mean) were obtained, and bladder cancer muscle invasiveness and lymph node involvement were determined. The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/MR and its derived parameters for tumor diagnosis and staging was analyzed using transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) or radical cystectomy (RC) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology as the " gold standard". Independent-sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test or χ2 test was used to analyze the data, and Delong test was used to compare different AUCs. Results:Of 40 patients, 8 were non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), 32 were muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and 5 were pathologically confirmed to have lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MR for identifying MIBC were 96.9%(31/32), 7/8, 96.9%(31/32), 7/8, 95.0%(38/40), respectively, and those for lymph node metastasis were 4/5, 90.0%(18/20), 4/6, 18/19, 88.0%(22/25), respectively. For pathological tumor (pT) staging, significant differences were observed between pT2-3 and pT1 groups in maximum tumor diameter ( t=-2.37, P=0.024), SUV mean( Z=-2.11, P=0.035), and ADC mean( t=2.91, P=0.006). The AUCs of maximum tumor diameter, SUV mean and ADC mean in distinguishing MIBC were 0.781, 0.746, and 0.825, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of MRI alone in identifying MIBC were 87.5%(28/32), 1/8, 80.0%(28/35), 1/5 and 72.5%(29/40), respectively, with the AUC of 0.500. The AUC of 18F-FDG PET/MR in identifying MIBC was 0.796, which was better than MRI alone ( Z=5.54, P<0.001), and the accuracy of PET/MR was also higher than MRI alone ( χ2=7.44, P=0.006). Conclusion:Compared with MRI alone, 18F-FDG PET/MR significantly improves the diagnostic efficacy of bladder cancer and the accuracy of pT staging.
