Reliability and validity analysis of different measurement methods for quantifying glenoid bone defect proportion in bony Bankart lesions of the shoulder joint under 30° arthroscopy
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20250604-00318
- VernacularTitle:30°关节镜下不同测量方法对量化骨性Bankart损伤肩关节盂骨缺损比例的信度与效度分析
- Author:
Yiqi YANG
1
;
Songyan LI
;
Guangyuan DU
;
Jingyi LI
;
Jie LUO
;
Huachen LIU
;
Youzhi CAI
;
Bin WANG
Author Information
1. 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院骨科，杭州 310006
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Shoulder Joint;
Shoulder fractures;
Joint instability;
Arthroscopy;
Bankart lesions
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2025;41(11):1077-1085
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the reliability and validity of different measurement methods under 30° arthroscopy for quantifying the proportion of glenoid bone defect in bony Bankart lesions of the shoulder joint and validate its preliminary application effect.Methods:Eight intact shoulder glenoid specimens were selected, with no existing defects or deformities, from donors of 4 females and 4 males, with their age at death of 43-67 years [(54.4±8.0)years]. Bone defects of 12.5% and 25% were created in the glenoid at 0° and 45° relative to the longitudinal axis, with two specimens per defect category. The defect proportion in each specimen was quantified using direct measurement and CT-based digital reconstruction and these values served as reference standards for subsequent statistical analysis. Using a combined approach of arthroscopic simulation equipment and cadaveric study, five investigators performed simulated examinations through the standard posterior portal (2 cm medial and 1.5 cm inferior to the posterolateral acromial corner) and the modified posteroinferior portal (2 cm medial and 3 cm inferior to the posterolateral acromial corner) separately. Under 30° arthroscopy, the glenoid bone loss percentage was measured using the bare spot method and secant chord method. The reliability was analyzed for these measurements. Furthermore, using direct physical measurements and CT-based three-dimensional reconstruction data from the same specimens as reference standards, the comprehensive validity of four measurement methods was evaluated (standard posterior portal-bare spot method, standard posterior portal-secant chord method, modified posteroinferior portal-bare spot method, and modified posteroinferior portal-secant chord method). The independent validity of each method was assessed according to bone defect morphology classification to determine differences in measurement accuracy across defect types. In an arthroscopic procedure for a patient with Bigliani type IIIB bony Bankart lesion, the standard posterior portal-secant chord method was applied to quantify the proportion of glenoid bone defects.Results:The mean reference values from direct measurement and CT measurement of glenoid bone defect proportion in eight bony Bankart lesion specimens were 12.71%/12.37%, 13.17%/13.10%, 25.71%/24.9%, 26.6%/26.95%, 13.41%/13.10%, 12.90%/12.59%, 26.42%/25.94%, and 26.73%/27.06%, respectively. Measurements obtained by the five investigators showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) all greater than 0.90, indicating excellent interobserver agreement. In the validity analysis, the standard posterior portal-secant chord method demonstrated the highest overall validity. Using direct measurement and CT-based measurement as reference standards, the overall validity was (0.90±0.38)% and (1.07±0.53)% for the standard posterior portal-bare spot method, (1.33±0.40)% and (1.51±0.54)% for the modified posteroinferior portal-bare spot method, and (0.53±0.17)% and (0.70±0.38)% ( P<0.05) for the modified posteroinferior portal-secant chord method. In contrast, the standard posterior portal-secant chord method showed an overall validity of (0.10±0.10)% and (0.28±0.39)% ( P>0.05). In subsequent independent validity analyses, the standard posterior portal-secant chord method also demonstrated superior validity across all bone defect subtypes over the other three methods. In a patient with a Bigliani type IIIB bony Bankart lesion, we used the standard posterior portal-secant chord method to quantify the glenoid bone loss in 2 minutes, revealing a defect proportion of 26.6%. An arthroscopic autologous iliac bone graft procedure with single-tunnel elastic fixation guided by this measurement achieved favorable outcomes, with stable reduction, secure internal fixation and favorable recovery of shoulder function at 2 months postoperatively. Conclusion:For various types of bony Bankart lesions, the 30° arthroscopic standard posterior portal-secant chord method provides the most accurate quantification of glenoid bone loss and its preliminary clinical application yields satisfactory results.
