Efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20240825-00523
- VernacularTitle:双平面固定联合植骨治疗重度骨质疏松性复杂股骨转子间骨折的疗效
- Author:
Faqi CAO
1
;
Xudong XIE
;
Wu ZHOU
;
Bobin MI
;
Yiqiang HU
;
Hang XUE
;
Mengfei LIU
;
Yingze ZHANG
;
Guohui LIU
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院骨科，武汉 430022
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femoral fractures;
Osteoporosis;
Fracture fixation, internal
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2025;41(1):51-57
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 28 patients with critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2020 and December 2022, including 3 males and 25 females, aged 70-91 years [(79.4±6.3)years]. T score for bone mineral density was -2.5~-4.1 SD［（-3.3±0.6）SD］. All the patients were found with type A2.2-A3.3 fracture based on AO classification, and were complicated with trochanteric lateral wall fracture. Among them, 16 patients underwent biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting (biplanar fixation group), while 12 underwent PFNA internal fixation (PFNA group). All the patients received anti-osteoporosis therapy after surgery. The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels at 3 days postoperatively, and time to weight-bearing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up and the incidence of complications were also detected in the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-16 months [(14.1±1.4)months]. In the biplanar fixation group, the operative time was (75.1±15.3)minutes, significantly longer than (45.6±14.2)minutes in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the intraoperative blood loss was (234.1±11.8)ml, significantly more than (170.0±13.4)ml in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the hemoglobin level at 3 days postoperatively was (82.6±9.3)g/L in the biplanar fixation group, higher than (64.8±6.8)g/L in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). The time to weight-bearing was (1.1±0.7)weeks in the biplanar fixation group, significantly shorter than (3.2±1.2)weeks in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). The VAS scores and Harris hip scores in the two groups were gradually improved with the prolongation of postoperative time ( P<0.05 or 0.01). No complications such as neurovascular injuries were observed in either group. One patient in the biplanar fixation group developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with a complication rate of 6.3%, while 2 patients in the PFNA group developed lower extremity DVT and 4 hypostatic pneumonia, with a complication rate of 50.0% ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PFNA internal fixation, biplanar fixation with bone grafting has the advantages of less postoperative blood loss, earlier weight-bearing exercises and lower incidence of complications in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, despite longer operative time and more intraoperative blood loss.
