Application effects of mind map-based health education in improving postoperative rehabilitation of patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20240912-00555
- VernacularTitle:思维导图式健康教育在创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者术后康复中的应用效果
- Author:
Kaixuan LU
1
;
Lili CHEN
;
Jing ZHANG
;
Xinru LIU
;
Lan WEI
Author Information
1. 郑州市骨科医院护理部，郑州 450052
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Spinal cord injuries;
Health education;
Patient discharge;
Post-traumatic growth
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2025;41(3):297-304
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application effects of mind map-based health education in improving rehabilitation of patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury after surgery.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 64 patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury admitted to Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital from August 2019 to September 2023, including 51 males and 13 females, aged 20-75 years [(52.7±12.5)years]. The injured segments were located at C 3/4 in 8 patients, at C 4/5 in 18, at C 5/6 in 22, and at C 6/7 in 16. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Scale was grade A in 3 patieats, grade B in 15, grade C in 18, and grade D in 28. All the patients underwent cervical decompression and fusion with internal fixation. Thirty-two patients received conventional nursing health education after surgery (conventional education group), while the other 32 patients received mind map-based nursing health education (mind map education group). Readiness for hospital discharge scale (RHDS) and quality of discharge teaching scale (QDTS) were used to compare the discharge readiness and quality of discharge instruction between the two groups at 4 hours before discharge. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and post-traumatic growth inventory (PTGI) were used to compare the anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic growth levels between the two groups before the health education, at discharge, and at 6 months after discharge. The incidence of complications was also compared between the two groups at 6 months after discharge. Results:All the patients were followed up for 6 months. At 4 hours before discharge, the total scores of RHDS and QDTS were (86.5±7.8)points and (142.9±2.7)points in the mind map education group, which were higher than (75.2±5.3)points and (125.3±2.3)points in the conventional education group ( P<0.01). Before the health education, no statistically significant differences were found in SAS scores, SDS scores, or PTGI total scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). At discharge, the SAS and SDS scores were (41.6±0.9)points and (41.4±1.1)points in the mind map education group, which were lower than (47.2±0.8)points and (47.0±0.7)points in the conventional education group ( P<0.01); the PTGI total score was (72.4±4.3)points, which was higher than (53.8±2.3)points in the conventional education group ( P<0.01). At 6 months after discharge, the SAS and SDS scores were (31.2±0.8)points and (31.0±1.0)points in the mind map education group, which were lower than (44.6±1.1)points and (42.4±0.9)points in the conventional education group ( P<0.01); the PTGI total score was (85.8±1.9)points, which was higher than (68.0±1.6)points in the conventional education group ( P<0.01); the complication rate was 6% (2/32) in the mind map education group, which was lower than 34% (11/32) in the conventional education group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with conventional nursing health education, mind map-based nursing health education can improve the discharge readiness and quality of discharge instruction for patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury after surgery, alleviate negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, improve their psychological status, promote post-traumatic growth, and reduce the incidence of complications.
