A control study of combined diagnosis of transrectal SWE quantitative parameters and PI-RADS 2.1 score for csPCa
10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2025.08.016
- VernacularTitle:经直肠剪切波弹性成像定量参数与前列腺影像报告和数据系统2.1评分联合诊断临床显著性前列腺癌的对照研究
- Author:
Yubo ZHOU
1
;
Tao LI
1
;
Xiaomei ZHAO
1
;
Lunhong ZOU
1
Author Information
1. 川北医学院附属三台医院泌尿外科 绵阳 621100
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Shear wave elastography(SWE);
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System(PI-RADS);
Clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa);
Multimodal imaging fusion;
Combined diagnosis
- From:
China Medical Equipment
2025;22(8):83-88
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the value of transrectal shear-wave elastography(SWE)quantitative parameters and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System(PI-RADS)v2.1 scores in combined diagnosis for clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa).Methods:A total of 80 patients with suspected PCa who admitted to Affiliated Santai Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January to December 2023 were prospectively enrolled,who were divided into csPCa group(52 cases)and non-csPCa group(28 cases)based on the results of pathological diagnosis.All patients underwent combined examination of SWE and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),and pathological validation with systematic puncture.The SWE was used to quantitatively obtain the maximum value(Emax),mean value(Emean),and standard deviation(SD)of Young's modulus of lesions,and the MRI morphologic assessment was conducted according to PI-RADS v 2.1 standard.A multivariate logistic regression was used to construct a combined diagnostic model,which stability was verified by Bootstrap resampling.The area under curve(AUC)values of the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were compared between single parameters and the combined diagnosis.Results:In the 80 patients with suspected prostate cancer,pathological confirmation showed 52 cases(65.0%)were csPCa,and 28 cases(35.0%)were non-csPCa.SWE-Emax values of the csPCa group and the non-csPCa group were respectively 68.5 kPa and 32.4 kPa,and csPCa group was significantly higher than non-csPCa group,with statistically significant differences(Z=6.731,P<0.001).The PI-RADS scores of csPCa group was 4.5 points,and that of non-csPCa group was 2.9 points,and the points of csPCa group was significantly higher than that of non-csPCa group,and the difference was significant(t=9.782,P<0.05).Spearman analysis revealed a strongly positive correlation between SWE-Emax and PI-RADS scores(r=0.83,P<0.001),and a negative correlation between SWE-Emax and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values(r=-0.71,P<0.001).The AUC value of combined diagnosis reached to 0.943(95%CI:0.898-0.988),which was significantly better than 0.891 of single SWE-Emax or 0.854 of single PI-RADS(Delong test P<0.05),and the sensitivity and specificity of combined diagnosis were respectively 96.2%and 85.7%.In addition,the diagnostic specificity increased to 93.8%when the combined threshold was set at PI-RADS≥4 and Emax≥48.5 kPa.Conclusion:SWE quantitative parameters and PI-RADS scores have significant complementary value in diagnosing csPCa.The combined diagnosis can effectively enhance the discriminative efficacy for PCa lesions with Gleason scores≥3+4 by integrating tumor stiffness and morphological heterogeneity features,which can provide an innovative imaging fusion strategy for precise stratification of patients in the gray zone of prostate-specific antigen(PSA).
