Comparison of effect and prognosis of small bone window surgery at different timings in treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20240730-00237
- VernacularTitle:不同时机小骨窗手术治疗高血压脑出血的效果及预后对比
- Author:
Qin QIN
1
;
Gang LI
1
;
Lei ZHAO
1
;
Jie SUN
1
;
Wanli WU
1
;
Shudi DU
1
Author Information
1. 贵航贵阳医院神经外科，贵阳 550000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Small bone window surgery;
Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage;
Surgical timing;
Prognosis
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2025;41(1):44-49
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore and compare the effect and prognosis of small bone window surgery at different timings in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).Methods:Using a retrospective analysis, HICH patients admitted to department of neurosurgery of Guihang Guiyang Hospital were selected from May 2021 to May 2023. According to the different surgical timings, the patients were divided into ultra-early group (time from onset to surgery <6 h) and early group (onset to surgery time ≥6~<24 h). Propensity score was used to match 51 cases in each group. The perioperative indicators (surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hematoma clearance rate), incidence rates of complications, neurological function (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel index), endothelin and arginine vasopressin (AVP) before surgery and after 7 days of surgery, clinical efficacy (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)) at 1 month after surgery, rebleeding rate and mortality rate within 1 year after surgery were compared between both groups. Chi-square test was used for between-group comparison of enumeration data, t test was adopted for between-group comparison of measurement data with normal distribution, and non-parametric rank sum test was adopted for comparison of ranked data between groups.Results:The intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in ultra-early group with (186.54±20.15) mL and (14.45±2.04) d were significantly less or shorter than (220.10±24.61) mL and (16.79±2.52) d in early group, the difference was statistically significant ( t values were 7.54 and 5.15; both P<0.001). At 7 days after surgery, the NIHSS ((14.55±1.57) and (16.14±2.13) points), endothelin ((69.14±6.37) and (73.48±6.83) mg/L) and AVP ((12.81±2.02) and (14.35±2.23) μg/L) in ultra-early group and early group were significantly lower than before ((32.67±3.81) and (32.38±3.53) points, (89.67±7.25) and (88.24±6.38) mg/L, (18.47±2.41) and (18.04±2.37) μg/L) while the Barthel index ((72.35±10.14) and (67.45±9.78) points) was significantly higher than before ((49.45±7.41) and (47.87±7.37) points),and the difference was statistically significant ( t values were 31.40, 28.13, 15.19, 11.28, 12.85, 8.10, 13.02, and 11.42, respectively; all P<0.001) and the NIHSS, endothelin and AVP in ultra-early group were significantly lower than in early group, while the Barthel index was significantly higher than early group, the difference was statistically significant ( t values were 4.29, 3.32, 3.66, and 2.48 respectively; P values were <0.001, 0.001, <0.001, and 0.015, respectively ). GOS grading (grade I-grade V: 1, 3, 9, 22, 16 cases) in ultra-early group at 1 month after surgery was significantly better than that in early group (grade I-V: 3, 5, 10, 26, 7 cases) ( Z=1.97, P=0.049). Conclusion:Both ultra-early and early small bone window surgery have good results in the treatment of HICH, but ultra-early surgery is more beneficial to the recovery of patients' neurological function and has better prognosis, which can be used as a reference.
