Application effect of integrated graded diagnosis and treatment and rescue mode based on circulation respiration abdomen motor speech score in patients with multiple trauma
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2024.05.011
- VernacularTitle:基于CRAMS评分一体化分级诊疗救护模式在多发性创伤患者中的应用效果
- Author:
Jianhua SUN
1
;
Weikang JIANG
1
;
Guozhi WANG
1
;
Liwen SHEN
1
Author Information
1. 上海市第六人民医院急诊医学科,上海 200233
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
CRAMS score;
Integrated graded rescue nursing model;
Multiple trauma;
Treatment effect;
Satisfaction rate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
2024;31(5):583-587
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application of the integrated graded diagnosis,treatment and ambulance model based on circulation respiration abdomen motor speech (CRAMS) score in patients with multiple traumas. Methods From March 2023 to March 2024,160 patients with multiple traumas admitted to the department of emergency of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital were selected as the research subjects. Based on a random number table,the patients were divided into an observation group and a control group,with 80 patients in each group. And the control group received routine emergency treatment,while the observation group was assessed by the intervention team using the CRAMS scoring scale to evaluate the condition,and then implemented an integrated graded diagnosis and treatment model based on the assessment results. The specific measures were as follows:establish an intervention team composed of 1 attending doctor from the emergency resuscitation room,1 head nurse specializing in trauma care,and 3 trauma specialty nurses. The attending doctor was responsible for diagnosing and treating the patient's condition;the head nurse specializes in assessing the patient using the CRAMS scoring scale;the trauma specialty nurses were tasked with implementing interventions for the patient. The CRAMS score,injuy seveity scoe (ISS),triage time,waiting time for treatment,treatment time,complication rate,and patient satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results There were no significant differences in CRAMS scores and ISS scores between the two groups before intervention. After intervention,the CRAMS score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (8.85±0.89 vs. 7.52±1.02,P<0.05),while the ISS score was significantly lower than that of the control group (15.98±2.98 vs. 20.77±3.02,P<0.05). The triage time,waiting time for treatment,and treatment time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group[triage time (minutes):3.25±0.62 vs. 5.89±1.02,waiting time for treatment (minutes):3.02±0.45 vs. 5.78±0.98,treatment time (minutes):45.85±5.23 vs. 65.22±6.41,all P<0.05]. Complication incidence of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group[3.75％ (3/80) vs. 12.50％ (10/80),P<0.05],while the satisfaction rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control[93.75％ (75/80) vs. 77.50％ (62/80),P<005]. Conclusion The integrated graded diagnosis and rescue model based on CRAMS scores can improve the treatment efficiency of multiple trauma patients,improve their condition and prognosis,and enhance their satisfaction with treatment.
