Impact of body habitus and gender on radiation dose in low-dose chest CT with spectral purification technology
10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20240808-00477
- VernacularTitle:基于不同剂量评价方法探讨体型及性别对胸部低剂量CT辐射剂量的影响
- Author:
Xinnan SHEN
1
;
Xinyou LI
1
;
Gang PENG
1
;
Chengxin WAN
1
;
Yajing YANG
1
;
Zhiwei ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科,重庆 400016
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Tomography, X-ray computed;
Radiography, thoracic;
Radiation dosage;
Spectral purification technology;
Water equivalent diameter
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2025;59(7):784-790
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of body habitus and gender on radiation dose assessment methodologies in low-dose chest CT, with particular emphasis on clarifying discrepancies among various dose quantification approaches and their associations with patient characteristics.Methods:Imaging data from 19 371 patients who underwent low-dose chest CT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into eight groups based on water-equivalent diameter (WED) and gender: Group A (150 mm≤WED<210 mm; 71 males, 1 032 females), Group B (210 mm≤WED<260 mm; 4 525 males, 8 005 females), Group C (260 mm≤WED<300 mm; 4 234 males, 1 105 females), and Group D (WED≥300 mm; 357 males, 42 females). WED, size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), and organ dose-based effective dose(ED Radimetrics)were calculated using Radimetrics software. Scanner-reported dose metrics, including volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and DLP-derived effective dose(ED DLP), were recorded. The ratios of SSDE/CTDIvol and ED Radimetrics/ED DLP were used to quantify discrepancies between dose evaluation methods. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to analyze dose metric differences across WED groups within the same gender, while the Wilcoxon rank-sum test compared gender-based differences within each WED group. Results:All dose metrics significantly increased with WED for both genders (all P<0.05). Within the same WED group, ED Radimetrics was significantly higher in females ( P<0.05), whereas ED DLP was higher in males ( P<0.05). The SSDE/CTDIvol ratio decreased with increasing WED, declining from 1.74 in Group A to 1.16 in Group D for females and from 1.68 to 1.12 for males. The ED Radimetrics/ED DLP ratio exhibited a decreasing trend with WED in females (1.82 to 1.30) but showed an initial increase in males (1.29 in Group A to 1.31 in Group B) before decreasing to 0.94 in Group D (all intergroup P<0.05). SSDE/CTDIvol and ED Radimetrics/ED DLP ratios of females were consistently higher than that of males within each WED group (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Patient body habitus and gender significantly influence radiation dose distribution in low-dose chest CT. Larger body habitus is associated with higher radiation doses, while females receive greater ED Radimetrics than males within comparable body habitus. Traditional dose metrics (CTDIvol and ED DLP) were underestimated for patients with small body sizes and female individuals.