Fish-shaped auricular cartilage framework in Chinese Han women’s comprehensive rhinoplasty
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20241114-00298
- VernacularTitle:耳软骨鱼形支架在中国汉族女性综合隆鼻术中的应用
- Author:
Yiming WEI
1
;
Huicai WEN
1
;
Huaiwei LIAO
1
;
Leqiang XIAO
1
;
Yuhan QI
1
;
Xuenong ZHAN
1
Author Information
1. 南昌大学第一附属医院整形外科，南昌 330000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Rhinoplasty;
Nasal tip plasty;
Autologous;
Auricular cartilage;
Nasal aesthetics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2025;41(8):789-798
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To validate the validity of the auricular cartilage fish-shaped framework in comprehensive rhinoplasty for Chinese Han females.Methods:The clinical data of Chinese Han female patients with short nose and saddle nasal deformity undergoing primary rhinoplasty at the Department of Plastic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, from August 2021 to October 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients underwent comprehensive rhinoplasty, involving the implantation of an auricular cartilage fish-shaped framework at the nasal tip and a dorsal nasal implant on the nasal bridge.Postoperative follow-up monitored for complications. At 6-month postoperatively, a satisfaction survey was conducted among the patients, their family, or friends using a scale where: very satisfied with improvement=4, moderately satisfied with improvement=3, Slightly satisfied with improvement=2, No improvement=1. Additionally, two plastic surgeons evaluated the postoperative outcomes using a scale where: excellent=5, very good=4, good=3, fair=2, poor=1.Preoperative and 6-month postoperative photographs were processed using Image J software to measure the following parameters: nasolabial angle, nasofacial angle, nasofrontal angle, columellar lobular angle, nasal height, and nasal length. Paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 18 patients were included, with a mean age of (26.4 ± 7.2) years (range: 18-45 years). The mean postoperative follow-up duration was (23.0 ± 9.3) months (range: 6 months to 3 years). All patients recovered well, with no severe complications occurring.The mean patient satisfaction score regarding the postoperative outcome was 3.50 ± 0.62. The mean satisfaction score from family or friends was 3.33 ± 0.69. The two evaluating plastic surgeons rated the outcomes as 4.17 ± 0.85 and 3.94 ± 0.93, respectively, both falling between the excellent and very good categories on the assessment scale.Statistically significant differences (all P < 0.01) were found between preoperative and 6-month postoperative measurements for all assessed nasal parameters. Nasolabial angle: 99.68° ± 2.95° vs. 95.37° ± 1.09°; nasofacial angle: 29.47° ± 2.99° vs. 32.82° ± 2.23°; nasofrontal angle: 140.72° ± 5.18° vs. 133.79° ± 4.43°; columellar lobular angle: 44.86° ± 3.43° vs. 39.23° ± 6.44°; nasal height: (57.52 ± 0.60) mm vs. (58.41 ± 0.39) mm; nasal length: (50.08 ± 0.54) mm vs. (50.64 ± 0.31) mm. Conclusion:The use of the auricular cartilage fish-shaped framework combined with a prosthesis in rhinoplasty, requiring only unilateral or bilateral auricular cartilage, effectively improved low nose and short nose deformities in the majority of Chinese Han females. This validates the favorable outcome of this framework in comprehensive rhinoplasty for this population.
