Anthropometric analysis of the anterior maxillary fixation points – A step in optimizing L-plates for zygomaticomaxillary fractures.
- Author:
Benedick B. BORBE
1
;
Ferdinand G. PAMINTUAN
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article, Original
- Keywords: Zygomaticomaxillary Buttress; Spiral Computed; Internal
- MeSH: Human; Maxillary Fractures; Tomography; Titanium; Fracture Fixation
- From: Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;40(2):34-38
- CountryPhilippines
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES
To determine and group the anthropometric norms of the zygomaticomaxillary (ZM) fixation points as a basis for optimizing the design of maxillary L-plates, from a sample population aged 19 to 59, in a tertiary government hospital in Central Luzon, Philippines.
METHODSDesign: Retrospective Review of CT scans
Setting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital
Participants: CT scan images of 110 surgical patients from the Department of ORL-HNS, obtained between January 2023 and December 2024 were measured
RESULTSA total of 169 maxillae were analyzed, comprising 85 right and 84 left sides. The maxillary width (MW) of males (30.59 ± 2.86 mm) was found to be wider than the MW of females (29.68 ± 2.69 mm) by 0.91 mm. The zygomatic width (ZW) and its inclination angle (IA), on the other hand, were not significantly different. There were also no significant differences in the MW, ZW, and IA between the right and left sides; with the MW mean at 30.17 ± 2.81 mm and a range of 24.40 36.80 mm, the ZW mean at 20.22 ± 2.47 mm and a range of 15.40–28.30 mm, and the IA mean at 111.13 ± 11.29 degrees and a range of 78.50–131.70 degrees. To capture the range of maxillary sizes among patients, a quartile-based grouping was introduced. The MW, ZW, and IA of the L-plates were classified into small (27.80 mm, 18.30 mm, 104.15 degrees), medium (29.80 mm, 19.90 mm, 110.70 degrees), and large (32.35 mm, 22.05 mm, 120.20 degrees) sizes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONThis study established reference values for the MW, ZW and IA to optimize the maxillary L-plate design for ZM fractures. The novel quartile-based grouping provided options for future L-plate measurements – potentially creating a better fit for patients, streamlining design in implant production, and improving the efficiency and outcomes of maxillofacial surgeons.
