Genetic analysis of two cases of submicroscopic chromosomal structural variants leading to abnormal pregnancies.
10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240709-00414
- Author:
Chengxiu XIE
1
;
Xiong ZHU
;
Yacong WANG
;
Qingsong LIU
Author Information
1. Department of Prenatal Diagnosis, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 610073, China. 35590551@qq.com.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- MeSH:
Humans;
Female;
Pregnancy;
Adult;
Male;
Karyotyping;
Chromosome Aberrations;
Abortion, Habitual/genetics*;
Preimplantation Diagnosis;
Genetic Testing
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
2026;43(2):143-150
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the genetic mechanism for adverse pregnancies due to submicroscopic chromosomal structural variants in two cases, and to provide a precise guidance for preimplantation genetic testing.
METHODS:Two families who had visited Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital for reproduction guidance due to recurrent miscarriages, adverse pregnancy history and abnormal genetic testing of the offspring in June and December 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Chromosomal karyotyping and optical genome mapping (OGM) were carried out on peripheral blood samples from the two couples, and preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) were performed on the blastocyst trophoblasts. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethic No.: 2023-23).
RESULTS:No abnormality was found on the G-banded karyotyping analysis for both couples. The OGM results revealed that the female partner of couple 1 had a translocation between 4pter-p16.3 (3.99 Mb) and 11pter-p15.4 (2.66 Mb), whilst no abnormality was found in the male partner. Similarly, the male partner of couple 2 had a translocation between 19q13.43-qter (1.90 Mb) and 22q13.31-qter (3.34 Mb). No abnormality was found in the female partner of couple 2. Neither breakpoints nor the adjacent region had involved an OMIM gene, except the formation of a fusion gene ZIM2-AS1-Z82186.1 (Both genes are non-coding, and the fusion gene was deemed as variant of unknown significance). PGT-SR of 11 blastocysts derived from couple 1 revealed that one embryo was suitable for priority transfer, three embryos were suitable for transfer, one embryo was recommended for genetic counselling, and six embryos were unsuitable for the transfer. For couple 2, six blastocysts were tested, of which only one embryo was deemed suitable for transfer.
CONCLUSION:When genetic testing of offspring indicates copy number variations such as deletions, duplications or mosaicism, the high-resolution OGM technique can be selected to screen parents for submicroscopic chromosomal structural variations. The result can facilitate accurate assessment for the risk of recurrence in offspring, selection of suitable method for reproduction, and identifying targets for PGT.
