Genetic analysis of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and a literature review.
10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240801-00420
- Author:
Lili ZHOU
1
,
2
;
Chenyang XU
;
Hao WU
;
Sheng HUANG
;
Xueqin XU
;
Xiaohua TANG
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China. jsnt_zhangyuquan@
2. com.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- MeSH:
Adult;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Pregnancy;
China;
Chromosome Duplication;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics*;
East Asian People/genetics*;
Karyotyping;
Mosaicism;
Pedigree;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide;
Prenatal Diagnosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
2025;42(1):94-101
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the genetic characteristics of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and its pathogenetic mechanisms.
METHODS:A pedigree which underwent prenatal diagnosis at Wenzhou Central Hospital between September 25, 2015 and November 30, 2023 was selected for the study. Clinical data were collected from the pedigree. Peripheral blood samples from the parents, amniotic fluid from the fetus, and peripheral blood sample from the neonate were obtained. Genetic testing was carried out by using G-banded chromosomal karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) technology. Relevant literature was searched in the CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and PubMed databases to summarize the clinical phenotypes of patients with 11q partial duplication. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Central Hospital (Ethics No. L2024-07-080).
RESULTS:The pregnant woman (G3) had a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. During her first pregnancy (G1), prenatal ultrasound indicated intrauterine growth restriction and a Dandy-Walker variant. Follow-up at 8 years of age showed developmental delays and mild intellectual disability. During her second pregnancy (G2), prenatal ultrasound revealed nasal bone hypoplasia, and the pregnancy was terminated at 23rd gestational week. During her third pregnancy (G3), all prenatal tests were normal, and the neonate showed normal growth and development at 4 months of age. The karyotype of amniotic fluid of her first pregnancy was 46,X?, and the SNP-array analysis of neonatal peripheral blood showed arr[GRCh37/hg19]11q13.4q25(70432450_134607121)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 40%. The karyotype for her second pregnancy was 46,X?,rec(11)dup(11q)inv(11)(p15q13)dmat[6]/46,X?[27], and the SNP-array result was arr[GRCh38]11q13.4q25(71406636_135067522)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 75%. The karyotype for her third pregnancy was 46,X?,inv(11)(p15q13)mat, and the SNP-array result was arr(XN)×1,(1~22)×2. The karyotype of the woman was 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q13), and that of her husband was 46,XY. A review of 12 similar cases (including G1) from the literature revealed that the common clinical phenotypes of 11q partial duplication included intellectual disability (12/12), developmental delay (12/12), ear abnormalities (12/12), microcephaly (10/12), seizures (8/12), hypotonia (8/12), and congenital heart malformations (7/12).
CONCLUSION:Mosaic partial duplication of 11q may underlie the genetic etiology of this pedigree. The pregnant woman is a carrier of an inversion on chromosome 11, which might have formed the mosaic 11q partial duplication through meiotic errors and mitotic trisomy rescue mechanisms during reproduction.
