Molecular Mechanisms and Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Regulation of Inflammation-oxidative Stress Axis
10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20260621
- VernacularTitle:基于炎症-氧化应激轴调控的中医药干预糖尿病足溃疡的分子机制与研究进展
- Author:
Haiyan WANG
1
;
Zixiang TANG
1
;
Lingling QIN
1
Author Information
1. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
diabetic foot ulcer;
inflammation-oxidative stress axis;
traditional Chinese medicine treatment;
multi-target regulation;
wound healing;
molecular mechanism
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
2026;32(9):61-68
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe and costly complications of diabetes, with its refractory nature largely attributed to the persistent vicious cycle of inflammation and oxidative stress. Conventional single-target therapeutic strategies often fail to effectively break this cycle. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), leveraging its unique philosophy of ''holistic regulation and multi-target intervention'', has demonstrated significant advantages in promoting DFU healing. This review introduced a ''systemic intervention'' perspective to systematically elucidate how TCM, through multi-component synergistic networks, precisely deconstructs and intervenes in this pathological loop. Firstly, this study provided an in-depth analysis of how, under hyperglycemic conditions, the crosstalk between the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathways, the imbalance in macrophage polarization and the disruption of redox homeostasis interact to form a self-sustaining vicious cycle that impedes wound repair. Subsequently, the core content systematically discussed the strategies by which TCM breaks this deadlock: (1) Active ingredients from single herbs (e.g., luteolin and astragaloside Ⅳ) can precisely modulate key nodes such as the phosphatidylinositol 3‑kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) and TLR4/NF-κB pathways, thereby suppressing inflammation and oxidative stress. (2) Classical compound formulas (e.g., Simiao Yong'an decoction and Taohong Siwu decoction) synergistically improve microcirculation and the immune microenvironment through multi-component cooperation. (3) External preparations (e.g., Shengji Yuhong Ointment and Jinhuang powder) potently exert local anti-inflammatory and pro-repair effects by activating pathways such as nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/heme oxygenase 1 (Nrf2/HO-1). Collectively, these three modalities embody a synergistic mechanism characterized by ''internal treatment modulating the internal milieu to address the root cause, and external treatment targeting the lesion to alleviate symptoms''.” Existing clinical evidence has confirmed that the aforementioned multi-target interventions can effectively promote healing and improve symptoms. However, this field still faces persistent challenges, including an unclear material basis for the efficacy of compound formulas, and insufficient standardization in quality control and clinical protocols. These challenges stem from the inherent tension between the complex systems-based characteristics of TCM and the requirements of modern standardization. Future efforts urgently require to leverage cutting-edge technologies, such as network pharmacology, spatial multi-omics, and artificial intelligence to propel the paradigm shift in the prevention and treatment of DFU with TCM from ''empirical multi-target approaches'' toward ''precise systems regulation''. This will provide a theoretical foundation for developing innovative strategies for managing difficult-to-heal wounds based on an integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine approach.