Relationship between gender and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for esophageal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- VernacularTitle:食管癌患者性别与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗疗效关系的系统评价与Meta分析
- Author:
Jinlong ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Haochi LI
1
,
2
;
Zhaohao LIN
1
,
2
;
Wei CAO
1
,
2
;
Weirun MIN
1
;
Xindong LUO
1
;
Xinchun DONG
2
;
Yunjiu GOU
2
Author Information
1. First Clinical Medical School, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China
2. First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors;
chemotherapy;
esophageal cancer;
gender difference;
overall survival;
progression-free survival;
systematic review/meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2026;33(04):639-645
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating esophageal cancer patients of different genders. Methods Computer searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) on ICIs treatment for esophageal cancer patients from the establishment of the databases to January 25, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcome indicators were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. The modified Jadad scoring scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Results A total of 10 RCT involving 5364 esophageal cancer patients were included in this study, with 2684 patients in the trial group and 2680 patients in the control group. The Jadad scores of the included literature were all ≥6 points, indicating high-quality RCT. Meta-analysis results showed that female esophageal cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment [HR=0.72, 95%CI (0.59, 0.87), P<0.001] had a more significant median OS prolongation than male patients [HR=0.73, 95%CI (0.68, 0.78), P<0.001]; while male patients [HR=0.57, 95%CI (0.52, 0.64), P<0.001] had a more significant PFS prolongation than female patients [HR=0.72, 95%CI (0.55, 0.94), P=0.01]. Female patients treated with ICIs alone [HR=0.66, 95%CI (0.50, 0.87), P=0.003] had a more significant median OS prolongation than male patients [HR=0.79, 95%CI (0.72, 0.87), P<0.001]; while male patients receiving ICIs combined with chemotherapy [HR=0.67, 95%CI (0.61, 0.74), P<0.001] had a more significant median OS prolongation than female patients [HR=0.77, 95%CI (0.59, 1.01), P=0.06]. Conclusion Female patients receiving ICIs have a slight advantage in OS compared to male patients, while male patients have an advantage in PFS. Male patients receiving ICIs combined with chemotherapy have better survival benefits than female patients, while female patients using ICIs monotherapy have better survival benefits than male patients.
