Clinical comprehensive evaluation of 16 commonly used kinds of enteral nutrition preparations in Hebei province
- VernacularTitle:河北省常用16种肠内营养制剂的临床综合评价
- Author:
Zhihan ZHANG
1
;
Yue CHENG
1
;
Lamei XU
2
;
Qingsong LI
1
;
Yuan GAO
3
;
Congxin LI
3
;
Shuqing GAO
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Clinical Nutrition，the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University，Shijiazhuang 050001，China
2. Dept. of Clinical Nutrition，Hebei General Hospital，Shijiazhuang 050001，China
3. Dept. of Pharmacy，Hebei Medical University Third Hospital，Shijiazhuang 050001，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
malnutrition;
enteral nutrition preparations;
drug selection;
clinical comprehensive evaluation
- From:
China Pharmacy
2026;37(3):281-287
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To comprehensively evaluate the 16 commonly used kinds of enteral nutrition preparations in Hebei province， aiming to provide a reference for the selection of drugs in medical institutions and clinical drug decision-making. METHODS Based on the Quick Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions （the Second Edition）， evaluation evidence was collected， and the included drugs were scored and evaluated from four dimensions of pharmaceutical characteristics， clinical characteristics， economy and other attributes. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS The scores for Enteral nutritional emulsion （TPF-T）， Enteral nutritional emulsion （TPF-D）， Enteral nutritional emulsion （TPF）， Enteral nutritional emulsion （TPF-HE）， Enteral nutritional emulsion （TP）， Enteral nutritional emulsion （SP）， Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF） （1.5 kcal/mL， 1 kcal＝4.184 kJ）， Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF） （1.0 kcal/mL）， Intact protein enteral nutrition （powder）， Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF-DM）， Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF-MCT）， Enteral nutritional suspension （SP）， Short- peptide enteral nutrition， Enteral nutritional powder （TP）， Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF-D） and Enteral nutritional suspension （TPF-FOS） were 82.9， 84.1， 84.1， 86.1， 78.4， 79.1， 82.6， 82.3， 82.4， 80.2， 83.0， 82.4， 82.1， 85.7， 76.0， 82.4 points， respectively. All medications scored above 70 points. In practice， appropriate drugs can be selected according to clinical requirements and patient needs.
