Application of emergency endoscope in patients suffering from acute gastrointestinal bleeding complicated with acute myocardial infarction: effectiveness, safety, and risk factors
10.3760/cma.j.cn114656-20240813-00559
- VernacularTitle:急诊内镜在急性消化道出血并发急性心肌梗死患者中的应用：有效性、安全性及影响因素分析
- Author:
Peng WU
1
;
Yi ZHU
;
Zhongman ZHANG
;
Huazhong ZHANG
;
Xufeng CHEN
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科，南京 210029
- Keywords:
Acute gastrointestinal bleeding;
Acute myocardial infarction;
Emergency endoscopy;
Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2025;34(7):959-963
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) secondary to acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is a common severe condition in emergency department. Currently, there is a lack of sufficient data regarding the use of emergency endoscopy in patients suffering from acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) complicated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objective of this study is to examine the present status, effectiveness, and safety of emergency endoscopy in such patients, and to determine the factors that influence clinicians' decision-making regarding the use of emergency endoscopy.Methods:Clinical data of AGIB patients complicated with AMI who were admitted to the emergency department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to June 2023 were respectively collected. Based on their survival status at discharge, patients were categorized into survival and non-survival groups. Additionally, according to whether emergency endoscopy was performed, patients were further classified into the emergency endoscopy group and the conventional treatment groupStabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) and logistic regression analysis were used to explore the correlation between emergency endoscopy and prognosis. A paired wilcoxon test was used to analyze whether emergency endoscopy could worsen myocardial injury. A multiple logistic regression model was used to explore the factors influencing clinicians to make emergency endoscopic decisions.Results:A total of 106 patients with AMI secondary to AGIB were included, and 22 patients underwent emergency endoscopy. After weighing, logistic regression analysis showed that emergency endoscopy was a protective factor for patients' survival after discharge ( OR = 0.808, 95% CI: 0.6755-0.967, P = 0.022). In the emergency endoscopy group, there was no significant change in hypersensitive troponin T before and after emergency endoscopy [ 61.1 (35.4, 164.1) ng/L vs 69.8 (60.1, 159.5) ng/L, P = 0.078]. Previous history of coronary heart disease ( OR = 0.098, 95% CI: 0.015-0.381, P = 0.003) was an independent negative factor for emergency endoscopic decision-making. Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) on admission ( OR = 1.217, 95% CI: 1.019-1.482, P = 0.038) was an independent positive factor for emergency endoscopic decision-making. Conclusions:Emergency endoscopy is safe and effective in patients with AMI secondary to AGIB. GBS score and previous history of coronary heart disease were the main factors affecting emergency endoscopic decision-making.
