Potential profile analysis of acute psychological stress in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention
- VernacularTitle:急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心理应激潜在剖面分析
- Author:
Jie ZHANG
1
;
Hejuan QIAN
;
Zhibin WANG
;
Na HU
;
Hongmei LIU
Author Information
- Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; acute psycho-logical stress; latent profile; influencing factors; quality of life; chest pain score; Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire
- From: Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice 2025;29(11):95-99,104
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective To investigate the curr-ent status of acute psychological stress among pa-tients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods A total of 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent PCI were selected as study sub-jects.The patients were surveyed through questionnaires usingBasic Information Questionnaire,the Stanford Acute Stress Response Questionnaire(SASRQ)and Comprehensive Quality of Life Assess-ment Questionnaire(GQOLI-74).Results The score of acute psychological stress in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI was(45.38±8.94).The acute psychological stress of patients was divided into three potential profile categories,namely low stress(C1 group,n=53),moderate stress disorder with high avoidance(C2 group,n=59),and severe stress disorder with repeated ex-perience(C3 group,n=30).There were statistically significant differences in age,gender,resi-dence style and chest pain score among the three groups(P＜0.05).The score of quality of life for patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI was(194.67±34.95).The quality of life level of patients in C1 group was higher than that in the C2 and C3 groups,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.01).The quality of life level of patients in the C2 group was higher than that in the C3 group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Clinical staff should identify the characteristics of different types of patients,attach importance to patients with a potential profile of repeated experiences of severe stress disorder,and carry out necessary psychological intervention in a timely manner to improve the subsequent treatment effect and prognosis of patients.
