Effect of left bundle branch area pacing on reducing atrial fibrillation following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation
10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2025.08.004
- VernacularTitle:左束支区域起搏对双腔起搏器植入术后发生心房颤动的影响
- Author:
Fang WANG
1
;
Songhai WEN
;
Feng LI
;
Jun WU
;
Shiyi LONG
Author Information
1. 556000 贵州凯里 贵州省黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院心血管内科
- Keywords:
left bundle branch area pacing;
dual-chamber pacemaker implantation;
echocardiography;
traditional right ventricular pacing;
cardiac pacing parameters;
atrial fibrillation
- From:
Journal of Interventional Radiology
2025;34(8):822-827
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the effects of left bundle branch area pacing(LBBaP)on atrial fibrillation occurrence after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.Methods The medical records of 87 patients who underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at People's Hospital between May 2021 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different implantation methods,the patients were divided into an observation group(n=45)and a control group(n=42).The control group received traditional right ventricular pacing(RVP),while the observation group received LBBaP.Serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),QRS onset-to-end duration(QRSd),echocardiographic parameters,cardiac pacing parameters,complications,atrial high-rate events,and atrial fibrillation incidence were compared between the two groups.Results Twelve months after surgery,serum NT-proBNP levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P＜0.05),and QRS duration(QRSd)was shorter in the observation group than in the control group(P＜0.05).There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)or left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVESD)between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively(P＞0.05).Left atrial diameter(LAD)was smaller in the observation group than in the control group at 12 months postoperatively(P＜0.05).No significant differences were observed in sensing levels or the proportion of cardiac pacing between the two groups(P＞0.05).However,the proportion of ventricular pacing was higher in the observation group than in the control group(P＜0.05).Intraoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively,impedance levels were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P＜0.05),while threshold values were higher in the observation group(P＜0.05).Total complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups(P＞0.05).At 12 months postoperatively,the incidence of atrial fibrillation was similar between the two groups(P＞0.05),but the incidence of atrial high-rate events was lower in the observation group than in the control group(P＜0.05).At 24 months postoperatively,both the incidence of atrial high-rate events and atrial fibrillation were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional RVP implantation,LBBaP implantation can significantly improve left heart function,provide more stable pacing parameters,and reduce the risk of long-term atrial high-rate events and atrial fibrillation.The risk of complications is similar for both groups,but LBBaP implantation increases the pacing threshold.
