Analysis of the effect of RIRS assisted stone basket in the treatment of calyceal calculus and its influence on stone clearance
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20241210-00378
- VernacularTitle:取石篮辅助RIRS用于肾下盏结石的效果及对结石清除率的影响分析
- Author:
Wei WANG
1
;
Xiaopeng XUE
;
Jie GUAN
;
Zhonghe ZHAO
Author Information
1. 青岛市胶州中心医院泌尿外科，青岛 266300
- Keywords:
Lithotripsy;
Kidney calculi;
Kidney calices;
Retrograde ureteral soft lithotripsy;
Calyceal calculus;
Stone clearance
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2025;52(8):539-544
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of basket assisted retrograde ureteral soft lithotripsis retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of subcalyceal calculi and its effect on stone clearance.Methods:A retrospective cohort study method was conducted on 120 patients with lower calyx stones treated at Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao City, from October 2021 to January 2024. There were 66 males and 54 females, aged (48.10±10.11) years old. The patients were divided into two groups based on their surgical methods: 60 patients who received only RIRS treatment were in the control group, while 60 patients who underwent RIRS with the assistance of a stone retrieval basket were in the observation group. The study compared various perioperative indicators (such as intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and hospital stay), as well as the stone clearance rates, inflammation levels, and postoperative complications at 3 days (short-term) and 30 days (long-term) after surgery. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( ± s), and t-test was employed for inter-group comparisons. Chi-square test was used for inter-group comparisons of count data. Results:The operation time of the observation group was (78.26±10.54) min, and that of the control group was (70.65±8.67) min. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding, the first time to get out of bed after surgery and the postoperative hospital stay ( P>0.05). The stone expulsion time in the observation group was (16.38±4.22) d, while that in the control group was (18.96±5.10) d, the stone removal rates of the observation group at 3 days and 30 days after surgery were 88.33% and 95.00% respectively, while those of the control group were 73.33% and 83.33% respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P<0.05). The stone expulsion time was shorter in the observation group compared to the control group, with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative inflammatory factors between the two groups( P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 6.67%, and that in the control group was 20.00%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Stone basket removal combined with RIRS is safe and feasible, which can not only improve the stone clearance rate, but also reduce the incidence of postoperative complications without increasing the inflammatory reaction, and has a significant effect. However, the clinical application needs to strictly grasp the indications and avoid overtreatment in combination with the individual situation of the patients.
