Clinical value of extraperitoneal stoma in laparoscopic Mile′s procedure
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20240926-00298
- VernacularTitle:腹膜外造口应用于腹腔镜Miles手术的临床价值
- Author:
Hualin XIE
1
;
Liuhua WANG
;
Bin LIU
;
Qiannan SUN
;
Jin JI
;
Daorong WANG
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院教学医院苏北人民医院胃肠外科，扬州 225001
- Keywords:
Laparoscopes;
Colorectal surgery;
Enterostomy;
Postoperative complications;
Defecation
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2025;52(1):44-50
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic Miles surgery through extraperitoneal stoma and intraperitoneal stoma.Methods:The medical records of 140 patients with low rectal cancer after laparoscopic Miles surgery admitted to Gastrointestinal Surgery of Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 80 were males and 60 were females, aged 50 to 75 years old, with an average age of 63.95 years old. They were divided into observation group (extraperitoneal stoma, n=70) and control group (intraperitoneal stoma, n=70) based on the stoma method. Through telephone, WeChat, outpatient follow-up and other contact methods, the intraoperative and postoperative recovery, the incidence of perioperative complications (stoma edema, stoma ischemia, peristoma inflammation, perineal/pelvic infection, lung infection) and the incidence of complications at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (stoma stricture, parastoma hernia/internal hernia, stoma prolapse/retraction), and the difference in the ability of artificial anus to control defecation at 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups. SPSS27.0 statistical software was used for data analysis and processing. Results:(1) Incidence of individual complications such as lung infection between the two groups of patients during the perioperative period (4.3% vs 4.3%, χ2=0.17, P=0.676), stoma edema (25.7% vs 21.4%, χ2=0.36, P=0.550), stoma ischemia (7.1% vs 7.1%, χ2=0.00, P=1.000), peristomal inflammation (20.0% vs. 18.6%, χ2=0.05, P=0.830), perineal/pelvic infection (15.7% vs 27.1%, χ2=2.72, P=0.099), there was no difference between the two groups. There was still no difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (72.9% vs 78.6%, χ2=0.62, P=0.430). (2) After follow-up to 6 months after surgery, the overall complication rate was 5.7% in the observation group compared with 22.9% in the control group ( χ2=7.06, P=0.008). In particular, the incidence of post-operative parastomal hernia/internal hernia did not occur in the observation group, while 8.6% of patients in the control group occurred (18.6% vs 42.9%, χ2=4.35, P=0.037). (3) After follow-up to 1 year after surgery, the overall complication rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group ( χ2=8.59, P=0.003). The incidence of parastomal hernia/internal hernia after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (2.9% vs 14.3%, χ2=4.47, P=0.034). (4) At the one-year follow-up, the overall excellent and good rate in the evaluation of bowel function in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (71.4% vs 48.6%, χ2=7.62, P=0.006). Conclusions:In laparoscopic Miles surgery for patients with rectal cancer, choosing extraperitoneal stoma has achieved good results, which can reduce the risk of complications 6 months or even 1 year after surgery, especially in preventing and controlling parastomal hernia/internal hernia. It has significant advantages, and at the same time, it can also promote the recovery of patients′ bowel function and reduce other related complications, thereby ensuring patient safety.
