Analysis of the advantages and safety of different tracheotomy in ICU patients with severe pulmonary infection
10.16066/j.1672-7002.2025.03.009
- VernacularTitle:不同气管切开术应用于重症医学科重症肺部感染优势与安全性分析
- Author:
Yunhua ZHU
1
;
Meisheng LI
;
Haixia LI
;
Lin YANG
Author Information
1. 商丘市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,河南 商丘 476100
- Keywords:
Tracheotomy;
Percutaneous tracheostomy;
retrospective study;
severe pulmonary infection
- From:
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
2025;32(3):179-183
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To study the effect and safety evaluation of percutaneous tracheotomy and traditional open tracheotomy in patients with severe pulmonary infection in ICU environment.METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 patients with severe pulmonary infections admitted to the ICU of Shangqiu First People's Hospital from July 2019 to June 2022 as the subjects of the study.According to the tracheotomy approach,they were divided into the Percutaneous tracheotomy group(n=40)and the Conventional tracheotomy group(n=40).The Conventional tracheotomy group underwent traditional routine tracheotomy,while the Percutaneous tracheotomy group underwent percutaneous tracheotomy;all tracheotomies were performed by the same physician.The two groups were compared based on different tracheotomy techniques,and the surgical incision time,intraoperative blood loss,complete healing indicators were analyzed to evaluate the surgical outcomes and complication rates in each group.RESULTS Compared with the Conventional tracheotomy group,the Percutaneous tracheotomy group significantly reduced surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,and wound healing time after extubating(P<0.05),and the incidence of complications such as difficult cannulation,pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema decreased significantly,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the BMI subgroup analysis of complications,it was found that in the BMI≥28.0 kg/m2 subgroup,the incidence of casing difficulty and pneumothorax complications in the Percutaneous tracheotomy group was lower than that in the Conventional tracheotomy group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the 22.0 kg/m2≤BMI<28.0 kg/m2 subgroup and BMI<22.0 kg/m2 subgroup,there was no significant difference in the difficulty of cannulation and pneumothorax complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION In ICU patients with severe pneumonia,early percutaneous tracheotomy can significantly reduce intraoperative bleeding blood volume,shorten the time of tracheotomy,especially in patients with BMI≥28.0 kg/m2,which has a lower incidence of complications.Percutaneous tracheotomy is worth promoting in ICU patients with severe lung infection who need tracheotomy.
