Biomechanical comparison between bilateral pedicle screw fixation and unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation under two endoscopic approaches
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2025.03.021
- VernacularTitle:两种内镜入路下双侧椎弓根螺钉固定及单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧椎板关节突螺钉固定的生物力学比较
- Author:
Zhongxin LIU
1
;
Wei LI
;
Dong REN
;
Zhenggang YANG
;
Nan HUANG
Author Information
1. 成都市第六人民医院骨科,成都 610051
- Keywords:
lumbar disc herniation;
translaminar facet screw;
lumbar interbody fusion;
biomechanics;
fi-nite element analysis
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2025;54(3):678-682,688
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the biomechanical difference between bilateral pedicle screws fixation and unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation under two endo-scopic approaches(interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach)through finite element analysis.Meth-ods The fusion model of simple fusion device(CAGEF model),interlaminar approach and transforaminal ap-proach models for bilateral pedicle screw fixation(BPSP model and BPSL model),and interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach for unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with contralateral translaminar fac-et screw fixation(TLFSP model and TLFSL model)were established.The peak value of spinal displacement,maximum stress of the intervertebral fusion device,maximum stress of the internal fixation device,and maxi-mum stress of the L3 and L4 intervertebral disc of each model under six motion states:forward flexion,back-ward extension,left/right flexion,and left/right rotation were compared among the models.Results Com-pared with the CAGEF model,the peak spinal displacement and the maximum stress of the interbody fusion cage in the other four models were significantly reduced,and the values of the four fixed models were close to each other.The maximum stress of the internal fixation device in the three motion states of left flexion,left rotation,and right rotation in the BPSP model was greater than that in the BPSL model,while the maximum stress of the internal fixation device in TLFSP model was less than that in the TLFSL model only under the forward flexion motion state.Compared with the TLFSP model and TLFSL model,the maximum stress of the internal fixation devices in the BPSP model and BPSL model was greater only in the two motion states of flex-ion and extension,while which in the other four cases was smaller.Except for the maximum stress on the L3 and L4 intervertebral disc during rotation in the CAGEF model was higher than the other 4 models,the maxi-mum stress on the L3 and L4 intervertebral disc was similar in all other models under other motion states.Conclusion Under both interlaminar and foraminal approaches,the bilateral pedicle screws fixation and uni-lateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation are both effective minimally invasive spinal fusion operations,and their biomechanical conditions are satisfactory.If choosing the interlami-nar approach,it is recommended to perform bilateral pedicle screw fixation,meanwhile decreasing the forward flexion and backward extension movements.Alternatively,a unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralat-eral interlaminar screw fixation can also be considered,while reducing left/right flexion movements.Howev-er,the specific treatment choice still needs to consider the patient's personalized treatment and the surgical operation ability of the clinical physician.
