Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Impairment Multidomain Scale
10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003703
- VernacularTitle:中文版肌萎缩侧索硬化多域功能障碍量表信效度分析
- Author:
Shilei WAN
1
;
Dan YANG
;
Nianquan LIU
;
Qianping JIANG
;
Dandan XU
;
Yan ZHAO
;
Jing ZHOU
Author Information
1. 湖北中医药大学针灸骨伤学院,武汉 430065
- Keywords:
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis;
Rasch model;
classical test theory;
reliability;
validity
- From:
Journal of Chongqing Medical University
2025;50(11):1578-1586
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Impairment Multidomain Scale(AIMS)into Chinese,and to investi-gate its reliability and validity among Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis(ALS)patients.Methods:A total of 161 ALS patients who were registered in the registry system of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Treatment Center for Motor Neuron Disease in Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from August 2023 to July 2024 were enrolled as subjects,and the Chinese version of AIMS was used for investigation after translation and revision.The Rasch model was used to assess the unidimensionality,in-ternal consistency,content validity,construct validity,and criterion-related validity of the questionnaire,and the classical test theory was used for item analysis,test-retest reliability analysis,and criterion-related validity analysis.Results:Unidimensionality testing showed that all three dimensions of AIMS have good unidimensionality.For all items except item 18,information-weighted fit statis-tic mean square(Infit MNSQ)and outlier-sensitive fit statistic mean square(Outfit MNSQ)ranged from 0.5 to 1.5,and point-measure correlation(PT-Measure)ranged from 0.63 to 0.87.The threshold between adjacent options of each item was>1.4 logit.Wright maps showed that item difficulties ranged from-2.24 to 2.08 logit,and the differential item functioning analysis showed that the absolute values of differences between patients across different char-acteristic subgroups were<1 logit.The overall scale and each di-mension had a reliability of>0.9,with an individual reliability of>0.7.The dimension of respiration had a separation index of 1.56,while the overall scale and the other dimensions had a separation in-dex of>2.The item analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between the items in each dimension and their respective dimen-sions ranged from 0.622 to 0.865(P<0.01).The overall scale and the dimensions of medulla oblongata,motor,and respiration had a test-retest reliability of 0.994,0.970,0.990,and 0.972,respectively(P<0.01).The criterion-related validity analysis showed that the correlation coefficients of total score and the score of each dimension between the Chinese version of AIMS and the revised version of AIMS were 0.863,0.829,0.876,and 0.755,respectively(P<0.01).Conclusion:The Chinese version of AIMS has a good degree of fit-ting and relatively high levels of reliability and validity,with moderate item difficulty,reasonable option settings,and high overall qual-ity,and it is suitable for the functional assessment of ALS patients in China.
