Short-term clinical outcomes of thoracoscopy-assisted mitral valve surgery:a single-center propensity score matching study
10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003817
- VernacularTitle:胸腔镜辅助二尖瓣手术近期临床结果单中心趋向性评分匹配研究
- Author:
Li TANG
1
;
Xu ZHAO
;
Hao CHEN
;
Hongkun WU
;
Yongjin LUO
;
Yong HE
Author Information
1. 重庆大学附属人民医院/重庆市人民医院麻醉科,重庆 400020
- Keywords:
mitral valve surgery;
thoracoscopy-assisted minimally invasive surgery;
clinical outcomes
- From:
Journal of Chongqing Medical University
2025;50(6):828-833
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of thoracoscopy-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery(minimally invasive cardiac surgery MICS group)versus conven-tional median sternotomy mitral valve surgery(conventional surgery group),including surgical metrics,postoperative complications,transfusion volume,and in-hospital mortality rate.Methods:A ret-rospective analysis was performed for 141 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in Chongqing General Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022,and these patients were divided into MICS group with 42 patients and conventional surgery group with 99 patients.Propensity score matching at a ratio of 1∶1 was performed to ob-tain 82 patients,with 41 patients in each group,and related data were collected and compared,including surgical procedure,cardiopul-monary bypass time,postoperative ventilation time,transfusion volume,and in-hospital mortality.Results:There were no significant differences between the MICS group and the conventional surgery group in sex,age,cardiac functional grading,and comorbidity with diabetes or hypertension,and as for the surgical procedure,there was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation(11/42 vs.26/99,P=0.583)or tricuspid valvuloplasty(14/42 vs.39/99,P=0.310).Compared with the conventional surgery group,the MICS group had significantly longer aortic cross-clamp time[(122±48)min vs.(91±50)min,P=0.031]and cardiopulmonary bypass time[(180±73)min vs.(136±72)min,P=0.033],while there was no significant difference in postoperative ventilation time between the two groups after surgery[18.6(12.0,36.2)h vs.24.0(15.5,33.1)h,P=0.265].There was no significant difference in the number of patients with acute renal failure after surgery between the MICS group and the conventional surgery group[grade 1:3(42)vs.7(99);grade 2:0(42)vs.2(99);grade 3:1(42)vs.9(99);P=0.398].There was also no significant difference in the number of patients receiving hemodialysis after surgery between the two groups[1(42)vs.4(99),P=0.531].The MICS group had a significantly lower postoperative transfusion volume than the conventional surgery group[120(80,240)mL vs.400(200,600)mL,P=0.002],and there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rate between the two groups[1(42)vs.2(99),P=0.665].After propensity score matching,there were no significant differences between the two groups in general characteristics(sex,age,and comorbidities).Compared with the conventional surgery group,the MICS group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time[(165±73)min vs.(122±74)min,P=0.053]and aortic cross-clamp time[(119±48)min vs.(98±52)min,P=0.073]and a significantly lower postoperative transfusion volume[120(80,240)mL vs.400(200,600)mL,P<0.001].There were no significant differences between the two groups in 30-day in-hospital mortality rate and postoperative compli-cations(including acute renal failure and requirement for hemodialysis).Conclusion:Thoracoscopy-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has comparable short-term clinical outcomes and safety to conventional sternotomy.Although MICS requires longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time,it has relatively low requirements for postoperative transfusion and shows favorable clinical outcomes.
