Efficacy and safety of oral melphalan as conditioning regimen in tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for malignant plasma cell diseases
10.3760/cma.j.cn115356-20241018-00153
- VernacularTitle:口服美法仑预处理在恶性浆细胞疾病第二次自体造血干细胞移植中的疗效和安全性
- Author:
Yuqi WANG
1
;
Juan REN
;
Huachao ZHU
;
Ruimin LIU
;
Pengcheng HE
;
Xiaoning WANG
Author Information
1. 西安交通大学第一附属医院血液内科，西安 710061
- Keywords:
Multiple myeloma;
Leukemia, plasma cell;
Transplantation, autologous;
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
Melphalan;
Transplantation conditioning
- From:
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
2025;34(9):537-541
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of conditioning regimen with oral melphalan in tandem autologous hematopoieticstem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with malignant plasma cell diseases.Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. The clinical data of 13 patients with malignant plasma cell diseases who underwent tandem ASCT between October 2019 and March 2024 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were collected. Compared with the use of intravenous melphalan as conditioning regimen for the first ASCT, hematopoietic reconstruction after transplantation, the therapeutic effects, adverse reactions after drug usage and survival of conditioning regimen with oral melphalan after tandem ASCT were analyzed.Results:Among the 13 patients, there were 10 males and 3 females, with a median age [ M ( Q1, Q3)] of 53 (48, 61) years; 11 cases were multiple myeloma and 2 cases were plasma cell leukemia. Before the first ASCT, tandem ASCT was performed 2-6 months later. The median reconstruction time of neutrophils after the first and second ASCT were both 9 (9, 10) d, and the median reconstruction time of platelets after the first and second ASCT were both 10 (9, 11) d, and there were no statistically significant differences in reconstruction rate of granulocytes on day 9 [69.2% (9/13) vs. 61.5% (8/13)] and platelets on day 10 [46.2% (6/13) vs. 53.8% (7/13)] between the first and second transplantation (all P > 0.05). There were 4 cases of strict complete remission (sCR), 3 cases of complete remission (CR), 4 cases of very good partial remission (VGPR), and 2 cases of partial remission (PR) before the first ASCT. After the first ASCT 1 month later, 1 case achieved VGPR, 1 case achieved PR, 11 cases achieved sCR; all 13 patients achieved sCR at 6 months after second ASCT. Compared with conditioning regimen of intravenous melphalan for the first ASCT, the non-hematological adverse reactions such as nausea (7 cases vs. 9 cases), vomiting (4 cases vs. 13 cases), diarrhea (4 cases vs. 13 cases) and oral mucositis (2 cases vs. 9 cases) in the conditioning regimen of oral melphalan after the second ASCT was reduced, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). After the 2 transplantation conditioning regimen with melphalan, Ⅳ degree myelosuppression occurred in 13 cases. After the second ASCT, the median follow-up time was 14 (10, 22) months, 7 patients received maintenance therapy containing lenalidomide, 3 patients received maintenance therapy containing bortezomib, 2 patients received pomalidomide maintenance therapy, and 1 patient received maintenance therapy containing CD38 monoclonal antibody. At the last follow-up, all patients survived, among which 6 multiple myeloma patients relapsed; and the median recurrence time was 13 (10, 22) months after the second ASCT. The estimated 5-year progression-free survival rate was 28.6%. Conclusions:Conditioning regimen with oral melphalan for the second ASCT is safe and well tolerated, and it may further improve the efficacy of the first transplantation.
