Result analysis of minimal residual disease detected by different methods in acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
10.3760/cma.j.cn115356-20250314-00040
- VernacularTitle:伴单核细胞分化急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后不同方法微小残留病检测结果分析
- Author:
Yake SHANG
1
;
Yingjun CHANG
;
Yaqin QIN
;
Yu WANG
;
Chenhua YAN
;
Yuqian SUN
;
Xiaojun HUANG
;
Xiaosu ZHAO
Author Information
1. 北京大学人民医院 北京大学血液病研究所 国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心 血液肿瘤细胞和基因治疗北京市重点实验室，北京 100044
- Keywords:
Leukemia, myeloid, acute;
Monocytes;
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
Minimal residual disease;
Recurrence
- From:
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
2025;34(9):530-536
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the consistency and sensitivity of minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by multicolor flow cytometry (FCM) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accompanied by monocytic differentiation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. A total of 218 patients diagnosed with AML accompanied by monocytic differentiation who underwent allo-HSCT in Peking University People's Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. MRD was detected by using bone marrow FCM and RQ-PCR at predefined intervals (at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4.5-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month before and after transplantation). Patients were grouped based on AML-related specific genes, and dynamic changes in MRD results detected by FCM and RQ-PCR after transplantation were analyzed to evaluate the correlation with post-transplant relapse.Results:A total of 218 enrolled patients included 114 males and 106 females, with the median age of 32 years (1-65 years). The median follow-up duration was 218 d (21-1 541 d). Hematologic relapse occurred in 26 patients (12.7%), with a median relapse time of 272 d (83-934 d); 35 patients (15.9%) died, including 15 (6.9%) due to leukemia relapse and 20 (9.2%) due to transplant-related mortality. Predictive markers for relapse included once WT1 positive (WT1+once), twice WT1 positive (WT1+twice), CBFβ::MYH11 fusion genes positive, mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL)-related fusion genes positive, AML1::ETO fusion genes positive, and once FCM positive (FCM+once), twice FCM positive (FCM+twice). The overall consistency rate between FCM and RQ-PCR for MRD detection in AML patients accompanied by monocytic differentiation after transplantation was 75.7% (165/218). The consistency rate of MRD detection results in WT1+once, WT1+ twice, MLL-related fusion gene positive, and NPM1 gene mutation positive with FCM was higher than the average value (>75.7%), while the consistency rate of MRD detection results in AML1::ETO and CBFβ::MYH11 fusion gene positive with FCM was lower than the average value (<75.7%). Notably, persistent low-level positivity without relapse after transplantation occurred in cases with WT1 (15 patients), NPM1 (2 patients), CBFβ::MYH11 (11 patients), or AML1::ETO (2 patients); in contrast, MLL-related fusion genes (particularly MLL::AF6 and MLL::AF9) positive after transplantation indicated relapse in patients. The sensitivity and specificity of RQ-PCR for MRD monitoring varied by genetic markers: WT1+once and WT1+twice (sensitivity: 66.7%, 50.0%; specificity: 84.5%, 91.1%, respectively), AML1::ETO (sensitivity: 100.0%; specificity: 50.0%), CBFβ::MYH11 (sensitivity: 100.0%; specificity: 58.6%), MLL-related fusion genes (sensitivity: 75.0%; specificity: 96.4%), and NPM1 (sensitivity: 75.0%; specificity: 91.7%).Conclusions:The sensitivity and specificity of AML-related genetic markers for recurrence prediction show differences. Discrepancies between RQ-PCR and FCM in MRD detection are notable in AML with monocytic differentiation after transplantation. FCM exhibits relatively lower sensitivity for MRD monitoring in this subtype, while RQ-PCR based on AML-related genes may compensate for FCM limitations.
