Empirical study of input, output, outcome and impact of community-based rehabilitation stations
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2026.01.009
- VernacularTitle:社区康复站投入、产出、结果及影响的实证研究
- Author:
Xiayao CHEN
1
;
Ying DONG
2
;
Xue DONG
2
;
Zhongxiang MI
1
;
Jun CHENG
2
;
Aimin ZHANG
2
;
Didi LU
1
;
Jun WANG
1
;
Jude LIU
3
;
Qianmo AN
4
;
Hui GUO
5
;
Xiaochen LIU
6
;
Zefeng YU
7
Author Information
1. China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
2. China Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing 100068, China
3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Disabled Persons' Federation, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010050, China
4. Jilin Provincial Disabled Persons' Federation, Changchun, Jilin 130041, China
5. Shandong Provincial Disabled Persons' Federation, Ji'nan, Shandong 250012, China
6. Guangdong Provincial Disabled Persons' Federation, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510300, China
7. Guangdong Provincial Rehabilitation Center for the Disabled, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510400, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
community-based rehabilitation;
rehabilitation outcome chain model;
questionnaire survey
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2026;32(1):83-89
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the present situation of input, output, outcome and impact of all registered community-based rehabilitation stations in Inner Mongolia in China, and analyze how the input predict the output, outcome and impact. MethodsFrom March 1st to April 30th, 2025, a questionnaire survey was conducted on all registered community-based rehabilitation stations in Inner Mongolia, covering four dimensions: input, output, outcome and impact. A total of 1 365 questionnaires were distributed. The input included four items: laws and policies, human resources, equipment and facilities, and rehabilitation information management. The output included two items: technical paths and benefits/effectiveness. The outcome included three items: coverage rates, rehabilitation interventions and functional results. The impact included two items: health and sustainability. Each item contained several questions, all of which were described in a positive way. Each question was scored from one to five. A lower score indicated that the situation of the community-based rehabilitation station was more in line with the content described in the question. Regression analysis was performed using the total score of each item of input dimension as independent variables, and the total scores of the output, outcome and impact dimensions as dependent variables. ResultsA total of 1 262 valid questionnaires were collected. The mean values of input, output, outcome and impact of community-based rehabilitation stations were 1.827 to 1.904, with coefficient of variation of 45.892% to 49.239%. The regression analysis showed that, rehabilitation information management, human resources, and laws and policies significantly predicted the output dimension (R² = 0.910, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, all four items in the input dimension predicted both the outcome (R² = 0.850, P < 0.001) and impact dimensions (R² = 0.833, P < 0.001). ConclusionInput, output, outcome and impact of the community-based rehabilitation stations in Inner Mongolia were generally in line with the content of the questions, although some imbalances were observed. Additionally, the input of community-based rehabilitation stations could significantly predict their output, outcome and impact.
