- Author:
Asimah MANGONDAYA
1
;
Noemi PESTANO
1
;
Bernadette TUMANAN-MENDOZA
1
;
Jan Andrei FLORES
1
;
Jan Andre MONTEMAYOR
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article, Original
- Keywords: Vascular Access Failure; Predictors; Patency; Avg; Avf
- MeSH: Human; Esrd; Kidney Failure, Chronic
- From: Philippine Journal of Cardiology 2025;53(2):58-64
- CountryPhilippines
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
A patent and functional vascular access (VA) is the lifeline of hemodialysis patients. Prevention of VA failure and maintaining patency are crucial to ensure efficient dialysis, reduce morbidity, lessen healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes. This study aims to determine the risk factors of VA failure among hemodialysis dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.
METHODOLOGYThis is a retrospective, case-control study conducted between July 2022 and December 2022. One hundred forty six ESRD patients consisting of 73 with VA failure and 73 without VA failure, undergoing hemodialysis in Manila Doctors Hospital (MDH) - Hemodialysis Unit were included in the study. At least one age (up to 5 years or younger) and sex-matched control was recruited per case (1:1 case-control sampling). The relation of patient demographic profile, smoking, comorbidities (ie, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease [CAD], peripheral artery disease [PAD] and heart failure [HF]), duration of dialysis, location of VA, preoperative vessel diameter and arterial peak systolic velocity (PSV) and history of central vein catheterization to VA failure were analyzed. Odds ratio and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association of risk factors to VA failure were calculated.
RESULTSBased on univariate analysis, the following are significant risk factors for VA failure: diabetes (OR 2.35, CI 1.20-4.62), CAD (OR 3.58, CI 1.58-8.13) and PAD (OR 3.04, CI 1.11-8.29). On multivariate analysis, two variables are significant risk factors associated with VA failure, namely: heart failure (OR 7.3, CI 2.15-21.4) and history of ipsilateral central venous catheter (OR 5.51, CI 1.99-15.3) (p = 0.05). Distal radiocephalic VAs have higher failure rates (53.42%) than proximal brachiocephalic (23.36%) and brachiobasilic (8.22%).
CONCLUSIONDiabetes, CAD, PAD, HF and history of ipsilateral central vein catheterization are significant risk factors for VA failure. Distal VA has higher failure rates compared to proximal access in these high-risk patients. This information may guide clinicians in making the appropriate recommendation regarding location of VA in this subset of patients. Aside from patient comorbidities, inherent characteristics, patency and functionality of VA vessels may be influenced by other extrinsic factors leading to VA failure.


