Living versus deceased donor liver transplantation in highly urgent patients using Korean national data
- Author:
Jongman KIM
1
;
Sang Jin KIM
;
Kyunga KIM
;
YoungRok CHOI
;
Geun HONG
;
Jun Yong PARK
;
Young Seok HAN
;
Nam-Joon YI
;
Soon-Young KIM
;
Jung-Bun PARK
;
Youngwon HWANG
;
Dong-Hwan JUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Annals of Liver Transplantation 2025;5(2):115-123
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are employed to address highly urgent patients, including those with acute liver failure (ALF), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), or critical cirrhosis. This study compares outcomes between LDLT and DDLT patients with ALF, ACLF, or critical cirrhosis in highly urgent LDLT (HU-LDLT) applications.
Methods:This study conducted a retrospective analysis of the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) data, which included 391 consecutive HU-LDLT applications from 2017 to 2021.
Results:The proportion of DDLT was 15.1% (n=59) within the cohort of HU-LDLT applications. The prevalence of hepatorenal syndrome, duration of pre-transplant intensive care unit (ICU) care, incidence of pre-transplant continuous renal replacement therapy, and median model for end-stage liver disease scores were significantly greater and prolonged in DDLT patients compared to LDLT patients. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in postoperative complications or overall survival between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, only pre-transplant ventilator care emerged as a significant predisposing factor for mortality.
Conclusion:The present study indicates that LDLT is a viable option, yielding comparable perioperative and long-term outcomes to DDLT for HU patients, which can encourage living liver donation to overcome organ shortages in HU patients.
