Preoperative phase angle is not associated with postoperative recovery in living liver donors: A prospective observational study
- Author:
Yeonji NOH
1
;
Yu Jeong BANG
;
Gaab Soo KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Annals of Liver Transplantation 2025;5(1):40-47
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Phase angle (PA) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for evaluating postoperative outcomes across various types of surgery. In this study, we investigated whether preoperative PA measured in living liver donors is associated with postoperative recovery.
Methods:Donors aged over 19 years, scheduled for elective purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, were included. Each donor underwent bioimpedance analysis(BIA), including PA, on the day before surgery (PA pre ) and the third postoperative day (PAPOD3 ) using the InBody S10 (InBody Co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea). Postoperativerecovery quality was assessed using the Korean version of the quality of recovery (QoR-15K). All donors completed the QoR-15K on POD3 and POD21 to evaluate their recovery following surgery and anesthesia.
Results:The mean age of the participants was 38.7±13.2 years, and 24 maledonors (59%) were included. PAPOD3 significantly decreased compared to PA pre(5.42±0.97 vs. 5.99±0.76; mean difference: —0.57, p=0.004). The extracellular water ratio (ECWR) on POD3 increased compared to preoperative levels (0.391±0.011 vs.0.378±0.007; mean difference: 0.013, p<0.001). However, skeletal muscle massindex (SMI) did not significantly change over time (SMI pre : 7.5±1.1; SMI POD3 : 8.0±1.2;p=0.67). Neither PA pre nor ECWR pre was associated with QoR-15K scores on POD3.However, SMI pre was significantly associated with QoR-15K on POD3, but not onPOD21. In the logistic regression model, preoperative BIA variables were not associated with in-hospital complications.
Conclusion:While PA pre was not associated with postoperative recovery or com-plications, a higher SMI was identified as a significant predictor of better recovery, suggesting its potential use as a screening tool in living liver donors.
