Prospective external validation of a deep-learning-based early-warning system for major adverse events in general wards in South Korea
- Author:
Taeyong SIM
1
;
Eun Young CHO
;
Ji-hyun KIM
;
Kyung Hyun LEE
;
Kwang Joon KIM
;
Sangchul HAHN
;
Eun Yeong HA
;
Eunkyeong YUN
;
In-Cheol KIM
;
Sun Hyo PARK
;
Chi-Heum CHO
;
Gyeong Im YU
;
Byung Eun AHN
;
Yeeun JEONG
;
Joo-Yun WON
;
Hochan CHO
;
Ki-Byung LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Acute and Critical Care 2025;40(2):197-208
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Acute deterioration of patients in general wards often leads to major adverse events (MAEs), including unplanned intensive care unit transfers, cardiac arrest, or death. Traditional early warning scores (EWSs) have shown limited predictive accuracy, with frequent false positives. We conducted a prospective observational external validation study of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based EWS, the VitalCare - Major Adverse Event Score (VC-MAES), at a tertiary medical center in the Republic of Korea.
Methods:Adult patients from general wards, including internal medicine (IM) and obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN)—the latter were rarely investigated in prior AI-based EWS studies—were included. The VC-MAES predictions were compared with National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) predictions using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and logistic regression for baseline EWS values. False-positives per true positive (FPpTP) were assessed based on the power threshold.
Results:Of 6,039 encounters, 217 (3.6%) had MAEs (IM: 9.5%, OBGYN: 0.26%). Six hours prior to MAEs, the VC-MAES achieved an AUROC of 0.918 and an AUPRC of 0.352, including the OBGYN subgroup (AUROC, 0.964; AUPRC, 0.388), outperforming the NEWS (0.797 and 0.124) and MEWS (0.722 and 0.079). The FPpTP was reduced by up to 71%. Baseline VC-MAES was strongly associated with MAEs (P<0.001).
Conclusions:The VC-MAES significantly outperformed traditional EWSs in predicting adverse events in general ward patients. The robust performance and lower FPpTP suggest that broader adoption of the VC-MAES may improve clinical efficiency and resource allocation in general wards.
