Prognostic differences between primary biliary cholangitis patients positive for different autoantibodies and related influencing factors
- VernacularTitle:不同自身抗体阳性的原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者预后差异及影响因素分析
- Author:
Yu LI
1
;
Yaowu ZHANG
2
;
Jinyu LI
1
;
Ye ZHANG
3
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Primary Biliary Cholangitis; Autoantibodies; Prognosis
- From: Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2025;41(11):2310-2316
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic differences between primary biliary cholangitis （PBC） patients positive for different autoantibodies and the risk factors for poor prognosis， and to facilitate early and effective intervention for PBC patients. MethodsA total of 141 patients who were diagnosed with PBC for the first time in Fenyang Hospital of Shanxi Province from January 2018 to December 2023 were enrolled and divided into group A （80 patients positive for anti-mitochondrial antibody M2 ［AMA-M2］ alone）， group B （36 patients positive for AMA-M2 and anti-gp210 antibody）， and group C （25 patients positive for AMA-M2 and anti-sp100 antibody）， and the three groups were compared in terms of general information， laboratory markers， and prognosis. The Globe score was used for prognostic evaluation， and a Globe score of<0.3 and the absence of liver cirrhosis at the time of confirmed diagnosis were defined as good prognosis， while a Globe score of ≥0.3 or the presence of liver cirrhosis at the time of confirmed diagnosis were defined as poor prognosis. A one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups， and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups； the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups， and the Dunn’s multiple test was used for further comparison between two groups； the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the influencing factors for the prognosis of PBC patients； the receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curve was plotted， and the area under the ROC curve （AUC） was calculated. ResultsCompared with group A， groups B and C had a significantly higher proportion of male patients， a significantly higher detection rate of liver cirrhosis， significantly higher levels of ALT， TBil， and ALP， and significantly lower levels of PLT and Alb （all P<0.05）. The Globe score was calculated based on related indicators after treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid （UDCA） for 1 year， and the results showed that there was a significant difference in prognosis between the three groups （P<0.001）， and compared with group A， groups B and C had a significantly higher proportion of patients with a Globe score of ≥0.3 （P<0.05） and a significantly higher rate of suboptimal response to UDCA （P<0.05）. The univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that anti-gp210 antibody， anti-sp100 antibody， UDCA response， PLT， Alb， ALT， TBil， and ALP were associated with the prognosis of PBC patients （all P<0.05）. The variables meeting related conditions were included in the multivariate Logistic regression analysis， and the results showed that anti-gp210 antibody （odds ratio ［OR］=4.959， 95% confidence interval ［CI］： 1.112 — 22.122， P=0.036）， anti-sp100 antibody （OR=21.666， 95%CI： 1.542 — 304.449， P=0.023）， Alb （OR=0.899， 95%CI： 0.814 — 0.994， P=0.038）， PLT （OR=0.974， 95%CI： 0.963 — 0.985， P<0.001）， and UDCA response （OR=10.275， 95%CI： 1.047 — 100.831， P=0.046） were independent influencing factors for the prognosis of PBC patients. The ROC curve analysis showed that PLT had the best performance in predicting the prognosis of PBC patients， with an AUC of 0.824， a sensitivity of 85.7%， and a specificity of 71.7%. ConclusionPatients with dual positivity for AMA-M2 and anti-gp210 antibody， as well as those with dual positivity for AMA-M2 and anti-sp100 antibody， tend to have a poorer prognosis and a higher rate of suboptimal response to UDCA. Furthermore， positivity for anti-gp210 antibody， positivity for anti-sp100 antibody， thrombocytopenia， hypoalbuminemia， and suboptimal response to UDCA all indicate poor clinical prognosis.
