How are different traditional Chinese medicine modalities deployed by clinical practitioners in China? Findings from a national survey.
10.1016/j.joim.2024.11.004
- Author:
Ran GUO
1
;
Dian ZENG
2
;
Qi ZHAO
3
;
Xin-Yi ZHANG
1
;
Xiao-Ke ZHANG
1
;
Yuan-Li LIU
4
,
5
Author Information
1. School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
2. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
3. Office of Hospital Affairs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union of Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
4. School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: liuyuanli_pumc@
5. com.
- Publication Type:Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Clinical modalities;
Deployment;
Medicine, Chinese traditional
- MeSH:
Medicine, Chinese Traditional/statistics & numerical data*;
Humans;
China;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Female;
Male;
Physicians/statistics & numerical data*;
Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data*;
Adult;
Middle Aged
- From:
Journal of Integrative Medicine
2025;23(1):36-45
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) incorporates traditional diagnostic methods and several major treatment modalities including Chinese herbal medicine, Chinese patent medicine, and non-pharmacological methods such as acupuncture and tuina. Even though TCM is used daily by more than 70,000 healthcare facilities and over 700,000 clinical practitioners in China, there is a poor understanding of the extent to which TCM diagnostic methods are used, how different treatment modalities are deployed in general, and what major factors may affect the integration of TCM and Western medicine. This study aimed to fill this void in the literature.
METHODS:In the 2021 National Healthcare Improvement Evaluation Survey, we included three questions gauging the perception and practices of TCM amongst physicians working in TCM-related facilities, investigating the frequency of their deployment of TCM diagnostic methods, and predominant TCM treatment methods. Our empirical analysis included descriptive statistics, intergroup chi-square analysis, and binary logistic regression to examine the association between different types of facilities and individual characteristics and TCM utilization patterns.
RESULTS:A total of 7618 clinical physicians comprised our study sample. Among them, 84.27% have integrated TCM and Western medicine in their clinical practice, and 80.77% of TCM practitioners used the 4 diagnostic methods as a tool in their clinical practice. Chinese herbal medicine was the most widely utilized modality by Chinese TCM physicians (used by 88.49% of respondents), compared with the Chinese patent medicine and non-pharmacological TCM methods, which were used by 73.14%, and 69.39%, respectively. Herbal tea as an out-of-pocket health-maintenance intervention is also a notable practice, recommended by 29.43% of physicians. Significant variations exist across certain institutions, departments, and individual practitioners.
CONCLUSION:Given that most of the surveyed physicians integrated TCM with Western medicine in their clinical practices, the practice of "pure TCM" appears to be obsolete in China's tertiary healthcare institutions. Notably, remarkable variation exists in the use of different TCM modalities across institutions and among individuals, which might be related to and thus limited by the practitioners' experience. Future research focusing on the efficacy and safety of TCM interventions for specific diseases, the development of standardized clinical guidelines, and the enhancement of TCM education and training are called for to optimize TCM-Western medicine integration. Please cite this article as: Guo R, Zeng D, Zhao Q, Zhang XY, Zhang XK, Liu YL. How are different traditional Chinese medicine modalities deployed by clinical practitioners in China? Findings from a national survey. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(1): 36-45.
