Exploring critical thinking in the management of diagnosis and treatment of fulminant pregnancy-associated atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20250417-00375
- Author:
Fei GAO
1
,
2
;
Lunsheng JIANG
;
Shan MA
;
Yuantuan YAO
;
Wanping AO
;
Bao FU
Author Information
1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, China. Corresponding author: Fu Bao, Email: fubao0607@
2. com.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- MeSH:
Humans;
Female;
Pregnancy;
Adult;
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/therapy*;
Intensive Care Units;
Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/therapy*;
Critical Care
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2025;37(7):680-683
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Critical care emphasizes critical thinking, focuses on the triggers that lead to disease progression, and attaches great importance to early diagnosis of diseases and assessment of the compensatory capacity of vital organs. Pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (P-aHUS) is relatively rare in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most cases occur within 10 weeks after delivery. Severe cases can be life-threatening. It characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, decreased platelet count (PLT), and acute kidney injury (AKI). Early clinical diagnosis is difficult due to its similarity to various disease manifestations. On January 28, 2024, a 26-year-old pregnant woman at 26+3 weeks gestation was transferred to the ICU 19 hours post-vaginal delivery due to abdominal pain, reduced urine output, decreased PLT, elevated D-dimer, tachycardia, increased respiratory rate and declined oxygenation. On the day of ICU admission, the critical care physician identified the causes that triggered the acute respiratory and circulatory events based on the "holistic and local" critical care thinking. The condition was stabilized rapidly by improving the capacity overload. In terms of etiological diagnosis, under the guidance of the "point and face" critical care thinking, starting from abnormality indicators including a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) and PLT and elevated D-dimer and fibrin degradation product (FDP) without other abnormal coagulation indicators, the critical care physician ultimately determined the diagnosis direction of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) by delving deeply into the essence of the disease and formulating a laboratory examination plan in a reasonable and orderly manner. In terms of in-depth diagnosis, combining the disease development process, family history, and past history, applying the two-way falsification thinking of "forward and reverse" as well as "questioning and hypothesis", the diagnosis possibilities of preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome [including hemolysis (H), elevated liver function (EL) and low platelet count (LP)], thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and autoimmune inflammatory diseases inducing the condition was ruled out. The diagnosis of complement activation-induced P-aHUS was finally established for the patient, according to the positive result of the complement factor H (CFH). Active decision was made in the initial treatment. The plasma exchange was initiated early. "Small goals" were formulated in stages. The "small endpoints" were dynamically controlled in a goal-oriented manner to achieve continuous realization of the overall treatment effect through phased "small goals". On the 5th day of ICU treatment, the trend of microthrombosis in the patient was controlled, organ function damage was improved, and the patient was transferred out of the ICU. It is possible to reach a favorable clinical outcome for critically ill patients by applying a critical care mindset to quickly integrate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, accurately identifying the triggers and causes that led to the progression of the disease, and using critical care medical techniques for early and effective intervention.
