Time-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics of Contextual Fear Memory Retrieval Reveals the Function of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 9 in Reconsolidation.
10.1007/s12264-024-01324-w
- Author:
Wen-Ting GUO
1
;
Wen-Xing LI
1
;
Yu-Chen LIU
1
;
Ya-Bo ZHAO
1
;
Lin XU
2
,
3
;
Qi-Xin ZHOU
3
,
4
Author Information
1. Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms, Laboratory of Learning and Memory, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
2. Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms, Laboratory of Learning and Memory, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China. lxu@vip.
3. com.
4. Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms, Laboratory of Learning and Memory, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China. qixin_zhou@vip.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
DPP9;
Fear memory retrieval;
Reconsolidation;
Temporal gene expression;
Transcriptome analysis
- MeSH:
Animals;
Fear/physiology*;
Male;
Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases/genetics*;
Memory Consolidation/physiology*;
Time Factors;
Mental Recall/drug effects*;
Mice;
Gene Expression Profiling
- From:
Neuroscience Bulletin
2025;41(1):16-32
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Numerous studies on the formation and consolidation of memory have shown that memory processes are characterized by phase-dependent and dynamic regulation. Memory retrieval, as the only representation of memory content and an active form of memory processing that induces memory reconsolidation, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although the molecular mechanisms specific to memory retrieval-induced reconsolidation have been gradually revealed, an understanding of the time-dependent regulatory mechanisms of this process is still lacking. In this study, we applied a transcriptome analysis of memory retrieval at different time points in the recent memory stage. Differential expression analysis and Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) depicting temporal gene expression patterns indicated that most differential gene expression occurred at 48 h, and the STEM cluster showing the greatest transcriptional upregulation at 48 h demonstrated the most significant difference. We then screened the differentially-expressed genes associated with that met the expression patterns of those cluster-identified genes that have been reported to be involved in learning and memory processes in addition to dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9). Further quantitative polymerase chain reaction verification and pharmacological intervention suggested that DPP9 is involved in 48-h fear memory retrieval and viral vector-mediated overexpression of DPP9 countered the 48-h retrieval-induced attenuation of fear memory. Taken together, our findings suggest that temporal gene expression patterns are induced by recent memory retrieval and provide hitherto undocumented evidence of the role of DPP9 in the retrieval-induced reconsolidation of fear memory.
