Diagnostic value of high-resolution temporal bone CT combined with DW-MRI fusion technology in middle ear cholesteatoma.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.12.004
- Author:
Qimei YANG
1
;
Yaya CAO
1
;
Long JIN
2
;
Jin ZHANG
1
;
Jinrui MA
1
;
Wen ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery，Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital，Xi' an，710068，China.
2. Department of Radiotherapy，Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
CT-MRI fusion imaging;
diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging;
high-resolution computed tomography;
middle ear cholesteatoma
- MeSH:
Humans;
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/diagnostic imaging*;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
Temporal Bone/diagnostic imaging*;
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Female;
Male;
Adult;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Middle Aged;
Endoscopy
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;39(12):1120-1125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application value of high-resolution temporal bone CT and DW-MRI fusion technology in achieving precise diagnosis and anatomical localization of middle ear cholesteatoma during endoscopic surgery. Methods:Eighteen patients initially diagnosed with middle ear cholesteatoma in the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, from January to June 2024 were enrolled.Preoperative high-resolution temporal bone CT and DW-MRI were performed, and rtStation software was used for image fusion to construct CT-MRI fused images. The involvement of cholesteatoma in six anatomical subregions of the temporal bone was evaluated. Using surgical pathology as the gold standard, and combining surgical videos and anatomical records, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of pure CT, pure DW-MRI, and CT-MRI fused images in evaluating middle ear cholesteatoma lesions were compared. Results:A total of 18 patients were included, and 17 cases were pathologically confirmed as middle ear cholesteatoma postoperatively. The sensitivity of the preoperative of preoperative CT was 100%, but the specificity was only 44.44%, with an overall accuracy of 72.22%; the sensitivity and specificity of DW-MRI evaluation were 81.46% and 85.19%, the accuracy was 83.33%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of CT-MRI fusion image to the spatial localization of cholesteatoma were higher than that of DW-MRI alone（92.59% vs 81.46%; 98.15% vs 85.19%）, and the diagnostic accuracy was also significantly improved（95.37% vs 83.33%）. The Kappa values for the agreement between HRCT, DW-MRI, and CT-MRI segmentation localization and pathological results were 0.444, 0.667, and 0.907 respectively. The chi-square paired t-test confirmed statistically significant diagnostic differences between groups（P<0.001）. Results demonstrated that CT-MRI significantly outperformed HRCT and DW-MRI in diagnostic efficacy for segmental localization of primary posterior congenital middle ear cholesteatoma. Conclusion:High-resolution temporal bone CT combined with DW-MRI fusion technology demonstrates higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis and spatial localization of middle ear cholesteatoma than single imaging modalities. It can provide more precise evaluation of lesion scope for endoscopic surgery, showing important clinical application value.
