Characteristics of middle ear cholesteatoma with tympanicsclerosis.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.10.011
- Author:
Xin LIN
1
;
Chan WANG
1
;
Yujin LEI
1
;
Xinyi ZHANG
1
;
Xuehua MA
1
;
Ningyu FENG
2
Author Information
1. The Second Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University，Yinchuan，750000，China.
2. Hospital of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery，the First People's Hospital of Yinchuan.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
cholesteatoma combined with tympanosclerosis;
hearing reconstruction;
postoperative efficacy
- MeSH:
Humans;
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/complications*;
Retrospective Studies;
Tympanoplasty;
Myringosclerosis/surgery*;
Female;
Male;
Adult;
Middle Aged;
Ossicular Replacement;
Ossicular Prosthesis;
Young Adult;
Ear, Middle;
Treatment Outcome;
Mastoidectomy;
Audiometry, Pure-Tone;
Adolescent;
Quality of Life
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;39(10):957-966
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the preoperative presentation, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes between middle ear cholesteatoma with tympanosclerosis （MECwTS） and middle ear cholesteatoma without tympanosclerosis （MECw/oTS）, thereby investigating the clinical characteristics of MECwTS. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 120 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of concomitant tympanosclerosis: the MECwTS group （n=49） and the MECw/oTS group （n=71）. All patients underwent preoperative evaluations including temporal bone CT, otoscopic examination, pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, and assessment using the Zurich Chronic Middle Ear Inventory （ZCMEI-21） quality of life scale. All patients underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty. Concurrent ossicular chain reconstruction was performed: partial ossicular replacement prosthesis （PORP） in 83 cases and total ossicular replacement prosthesis （TORP） in 37 cases. Intraoperative disease severity was assessed using the Cholesteatoma Comprehensive Score Scale （CCSS）. Postoperative follow-up lasted at least one year and included pure-tone audiometry, otoscopic examination, and the ZCMEI-21 scale administered at ≥1 year post-surgery. Preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap （ABG） and ZCMEI-21 scores were compared between the MECwTS and MECw/oTS groups. Additionally, surgical efficacy was defined as a postoperative ABG ≤20 dB; the hearing improvement efficacy of PORP versus TORP was compared based on this criterion. Results: ①Preoperative ABG showed no significant difference between the MECw/oTS and MECwTS groups（P>0.05）. Postoperative ABG was （18.65±10.21） dB in the MECw/oTS group versus （22.55±9.53） dB in the MECwTS group, demonstrating a statistically significant intergroup difference （P<0.05）. ②Intraoperative CCSS scores were significantly higher in the MECwTS group （8.04±2.18） compared to the MECw/oTS group （5.93±1.44） （P<0.05）. ③Preoperative ZCMEI-21 scores showed no significant difference between groups （P>0.05）. Postoperative ZCMEI-21 scores were （22.24±8.11） in the MECw/oTS group versus （27.02±7.21） in the MECwTS group, indicating a statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. ④Postoperative ABG ≤20 dB was achieved in 54 patients （65.06%, 54/83） in the PORP group and 16 patients （43.24%, 16/37） in the TORP group. This difference in efficacy rates was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The overall efficacy rate for ossiculoplasty was 58.33% （70/120）. Conclusion: Patients with MECwTS exhibit more severe middle ear and mastoid pathology compared to those with MECw/oTS, resulting in poorer postoperative hearing levels and quality of life outcomes. Both PORP and TORP implantation can improve postoperative hearing to some extent; however, PORP appears to offer superior hearing improvement efficacy compared to TORP.
