Clinical Analysis of Supral-abyrinthine Cholesteatoma and Literature Review.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.07.009
- Author:
Wang QIAN
1
;
Chengfang CHEN
2
;
Qinghua ZHANG
1
;
Chenhua WANG
1
;
Yuanhui GAO
1
;
Shudong YU
2
;
Huiming YANG
2
;
Guorui LI
1
;
Jianfeng LI
2
Author Information
1. Shandong First Medical University，Jinan，250000，China.
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery，Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University.
- Publication Type:Systematic Review
- Keywords:
congenital cholesteatoma of the temporal bone;
otoendoscopy;
petros bone cholesteatoma;
supral-abyrinthine cholesteatoma
- MeSH:
Humans;
Cholesteatoma/surgery*;
Ear, Inner/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;39(7):652-656
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate surgical strategies and clinical outcomes in supra-labyrinthine cholesteatoma management, providing evidence-based guidance for therapeutic decision-making. Methods:Seven patients with supra-labyrinthine cholesteatoma in our hospital from 2021 to 2023 were enrolled in this study. The clinical manifestations, imaging findings, and surgical outcomes of patients were retrospectively analyzed. A systematic literature review focused on surgical anatomy correlations and imaging-based approach selection. Results:All seven cases of supra-labyrinthine cholesteatoma were unilateral. Preoperative otoendoscopy, CT, and intraoperative findings confirmed that they were classified as supral-abyrinthine cholesteatoma according to Sanna's classification. Two cases were operated entirely with otoendoscopy, three cases used a postauricular approach with microscopic assistance, and two cases involved a combined approach with endoscopy and microscopy. Hearing reconstruction with ossicular prosthesis was performed in five cases, while two cases did not undergo hearing reconstruction due to preoperative anacusis confirmed by both subjective and objective hearing tests. In all seven cases, various segments of the facial nerve were exposed during surgery, but postoperative facial nerve function remained intact, hearing was preserved, no cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred, and no recurrences have been observed to date（as of June 2024）. Conclusion:With the advancement of imaging techniques and microsurgical technology, early diagnosis and surgical methods for supral-abyrinthine cholesteatoma have significantly improved. Compared to traditional approaches, the newer methods reduce unnecessary complications and offer advantages such as minimal surgical trauma, superior hearing preservation rates, and shorter recovery times with better postoperative neural function. This study reviews recent literature on petroclival cholesteatomas, combined with our own cases, to analyze the classification of supral-abyrinthine cholesteatoma and surgical approach selection. The findings aim to optimize treatment strategies and guide appropriate surgical methods, ultimately improving patient prognosis and quality of life.
