Analysis of cochlear reimplantation surgery and factors influencing postoperative auditory and speech function.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.005
- Author:
Qingling BI
1
;
Zhongyan CHEN
1
;
Yong LYU
1
;
Wenjing YANG
1
;
Xiaoyu XU
1
;
Yan LI
1
;
Yuan LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery，China-Japan Friendship Hospital，Beijing，100029，China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
auditory-speech rehabilitation;
cochlear implantation;
cochlear ossification;
reimplantation
- MeSH:
Humans;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*;
Retrospective Studies;
Cochlear Implants;
Male;
Female;
Postoperative Period;
Treatment Outcome;
Adult;
Speech;
Middle Aged;
Postoperative Complications;
Replantation;
Cochlea/surgery*
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;39(5):419-424
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The aim of this study was to present an institution's experience with cochlear reimplantation（CRI）, to assess surgical challenges and post-operative outcomes and to increase the success rate of CRI. Methods:We retrospectively evaluated data from 76 reimplantation cases treated in a tertiary center between 2001 and 2022. Clinical features include caused of CRI, type of failure, surgical issues, and auditory speech performance were analyzed. Categorical Auditory Performance （CAP） and Speech Intelligibility Rating （SIR） scores were used to evaluate pre-and post-CRI outcomes. Our center's consecutive cohort of 1 126 patients had seven patients, while 69 patients were from other cochlear implant centers. Device failure was the most common cause of CRI（68/76）, with the remaining cases including flap complications（3/76）, magnet displacement（3/76）, secondary meningitis（1/76）, and foreign bodies around the implant（1/76）. Postoperative auditory and speech outcome improved in 31.6%（24/76） of patients, remained unchanged in 63.2%（48/76）, and decreased in CAP and SIR scores in 5.2%（4/76） of patients. Postoperatively, the seven patients with cochlear ossification and fibrosis scored lower on the overall CAP and SIR scale than non-ossification individuals, which is a significant factor in surgical success rates and auditory-speech outcomes. Conclusion:CRI surgery is a challenging but relatively safe procedure, and most reimplanted patients experience favorable postoperative outcomes. Medical complications and intracochlear damage are the main causes of poor postoperative results. Therefore, minimally invasive CI has a positive significance for reducing the difficulty of CRI surgery and improving the CI performance.
