Feasibility of MAGIC pure tone screening in children aged 3 to 6 years.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.01.004
- Author:
Qingjia CUI
1
;
Fang GE
2
;
Renjie HAN
1
;
Jin YAN
1
;
Cheng WEN
3
;
Yue LI
3
;
Xin DAI
1
;
Lihui HUANG
3
Author Information
1. Rehabilitation Centre of Speech Therapy，Department of Otolaryngology，Beijing，100144，China.
2. Department of Otolaryngology，Shijiazhuang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital，Shijiazhuang.
3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery，Beijing Tongren Hospital，Capital Medical University，Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology，Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery，Ministry of Education.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
acoustic immittance;
compatibility;
distortion product otoacoustic emission;
multiple-choice auditory graphical interactive check;
passing rate
- MeSH:
Humans;
Child, Preschool;
Child;
Female;
Male;
Audiometry, Pure-Tone;
Mass Screening/methods*;
Feasibility Studies;
Acoustic Impedance Tests/methods*;
Hearing Loss/diagnosis*;
Hearing Tests/methods*
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;39(1):14-18
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the feasibility of the multiple-choice auditory graphical interactive check（MAGIC） screening module in childhood hearing screening in children aged 3 to 6 years. Methods:A hearing screening was conducted on 366 children（732 ears） aged between 3 and 6 years. The screening methods included MAGIC, DPOAE, and acoustic immittance.The cooperation, screening time, pass rate, and correlation of the three screening methods were compared. Results:There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of cooperation among the three screeningmethods（P=0.004）.The MAGIC pure tone screening method was 98.6%, the screening DPOAE was 99.5%,and the acoustic immittance screening was 100%. For the screening duration, the MAGIC pure tone screening method was（116.3±59.1）s, the screening DPOAE was（27.2±19.7）s, and the acoustic impedance screening was（24.6±14.6）s. There was a significant statistical significance differences among the three or two groups（P<0.01）. The passing rates of MAGIC pure tone screening,screening DPOAE and acoustic immittance screening were 64.7%, 65.4%, and 69.3%, respectively, and there was no significant statistical difference among the three or two groups（P>0.05）. There was no significant difference between MAGIC pure tone screening method and screening DPOAE（P=0.827>0.05）, and acoustic impedance（P=0.653>0.05）, while the difference between screening DPOAE and acoustic impedance was statistically significant（P<0.01）. Conclusion:MAGIC pure sound screening method has good feasibility, can comprehensively reflect the hearing level of screened children, and can be promoted for hearing screening in children aged between 3 and 6 years.
