Efficacy of the far lateral Key-hole technique in the treatment of central cervical disc herniation.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2025.250139
- Author:
Zhenyu MENG
1
;
Jingbo XUE
2
;
Xuelin LI
2
;
Zhun XU
2
;
Jinghua TAN
2
;
Yong XIE
2
;
Yiguo YAN
3
Author Information
1. Department of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China. 838225132@qq.com.
2. Department of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China.
3. Department of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China. yanyiguo@live.cn.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion;
central type;
cervical disc herniation;
far-lateral Key-hole technique;
spinal endoscopy
- MeSH:
Humans;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery*;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Adult;
Diskectomy/methods*;
Treatment Outcome;
Spinal Fusion/methods*;
Endoscopy/methods*
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2025;50(8):1408-1417
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:In the early stage of central cervical disc herniation, clinical symptoms may be mild. However, as the spinal cord becomes compressed by herniated nucleus pulposus tissue, progressive edema and degeneration may occur, resulting in more severe clinical manifestations, including limb weakness, bladder and bowel dysfunction, spastic paraplegia of the lower extremities, and even respiratory difficulty. The spinal endoscopic Key-hole technique is widely applied in treating radiculopathic cervical spondylosis and has demonstrated good clinical outcomes. This study aims to analyze and summarize the technical points and therapeutic efficacy of the far lateral Key-hole technique in the treatment of central cervical disc herniation, providing reference for clinical application.
METHODS:Eight patients with central cervical disc herniation treated with the far lateral Key-hole technique were included as the experimental group. Another 8 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) during the same period were selected as the control group. Data collected included gender, age, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospitalization. Pain severity was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); cervical function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score; and cervical disability was measured by the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological outcomes were assessed using disc height index (DHI), cervical Cobb angle, and operative segment Cobb angle.
RESULTS:Compared with the control group, the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter incision length, and shorter hospital stay (all P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). Postoperative VAS and NDI scores in both groups were significantly lower than preoperative values, and JOA scores significantly improved (P<0.05). No significant differences were noted between the two groups preoperatively (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the experimental group showed significantly lower VAS and NDI scores and higher JOA scores than the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in DHI before and after surgery in the experimental group (P>0.05), while the DHI increased significantly postoperatively in the control group (P<0.05). Postoperative DHI in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the cervical Cobb angle either within or between groups (all P>0.05). The operative segment Cobb angle increased significantly after surgery in the control group (P<0.05), while no other operative segment angle changes were statistically significant (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:The far lateral Key-hole technique offers advantages in treating central cervical disc herniation, including reduced intraoperative bleeding, smaller incision length, shorter hospitalization, and improved postoperative pain relief. Additionally, the technique does not affect cervical physiological curvature or stability in the short term, making it suitable for clinical application.
