Effects of ultrasonic rapid processing method on the protein, DNA, and RNA in paraffin-embedded tissues.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2025.230563
- Author:
Xiaohong LI
1
,
2
;
Jiadi LUO
1
,
3
;
Qingchun LIANG
1
,
4
;
Zhongyi TONG
1
,
5
Author Information
1. Department of Pathology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha
2. li1989@csu.edu.cn.
3. jiadiluo@csu.edu.cn.
4. 503079@csu.edu.cn.
5. zhongyitong@csu.edu.cn.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
DNA quality;
RNA quality;
hematoxylin and eosin staining;
immunohistochemistry staining;
molecular pathological detection;
ultrasonic rapid processing method
- MeSH:
Humans;
Paraffin Embedding/methods*;
Female;
RNA/analysis*;
DNA/analysis*;
Breast Neoplasms/pathology*;
Neoplasms/genetics*;
Ultrasonics/methods*;
Proteins/analysis*
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2025;50(4):664-674
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:The traditional processing method for paraffin-embedded tissues is time-consuming, while the ultrasonic rapid processing method has a short processing time. However, its effects on tissue proteins, DNA, and RNA remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the ultrasonic rapid processing method on proteins, DNA, and RNA in paraffin-embedded tissues through hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemical staining, and molecular pathological detection.
METHODS:Surgical specimens from patients with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, signet-ring cell gastric cancer, liver cancer, and other tumors were selected. Two tissue blocks (1 to 3 mm in diameter) were obtained from each specimen (previously processed and diagnosed by routine pathology). One block was assigned to the control group (traditional processing method), and the other was the experimental group (ultrasonic rapid processing method). Via HE staining, immunohistochemical staining, DNA quality fragment analysis, fluorescent in situ hybrid for HER2 gene expression test, second-generation sequencing for EGFR and ALK gene mutation test, real-time reverse transcription PCR (real-time RT-PCR) for prognosis detection of breast cancer etc, the difference between 2 groups was compared, and further impact of the ultrasonic rapid processing method was analyzed.
RESULTS:Compared with the control group, the ultrasound-assisted rapid method efficiently completed fixation, dehydration, clearing, and paraffin embedding, significantly reducing sample preparation time before pathological diagnosis. Results of HE staining, immunohistochemistry, DNA fragment analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 gene, next-generation sequencing for EGFR and ALK gene, and real-time RT-PCR for breast cancer prognosis were entirely consistent with those of the control group.
CONCLUSIONS:The ultrasonic rapid processing method can quickly and effectively shorten the time for specimen processing before pathological diagnosis, and will not affect the DNA, RNA and proteins of the specimens. It can meet the subsequent HE staining, immunohistochemistry and molecular pathological detection.
