Effectiveness of Acupuncture in Improving Quality of Life for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
10.1007/s11655-024-4119-4
- Author:
Xin YU
1
;
Si-Yao GONG
1
;
Qin LUO
1
;
Gui-Xing XU
1
;
Hao TIAN
1
;
Qian LI
1
;
Ming CHEN
1
;
Sha YANG
2
;
Shu-Guang YU
1
Author Information
1. Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China.
2. Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China. yangsha@cdutcm.edu.cn.
- Publication Type:Systematic Review
- Keywords:
acupuncture;
advanced cancer;
meta-analysis;
palliative care;
quality of life
- MeSH:
Humans;
Acupuncture Therapy;
Neoplasms/therapy*;
Quality of Life;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese journal of integrative medicine
2025;31(4):360-371
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of acupuncture on advanced cancer patients by meta-analysis.
METHODS:Nine databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and WanFang Data) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture in advanced cancer patients published from inception to February 13, 2023 and updated to June 1, 2023. Primary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), while secondary outcomes were pain, fatigue, and adverse events (side effects). Data synthesis was performed using RevMan V.5.3 to calculate pooled effect sizes. RoB-2 was used for the risk of bias, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.
RESULTS:Totally 17 RCTs involving 1,178 participants were included, 15 of which were pooled for meta-analysis. Most studies demonstrated some concern for the overall risk of bias. The pooled data indicated that acupuncture was associated with improved QOL [mean difference (MD)=6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.09 to 8.26], pain (MD=-1.18, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.08), and adverse events (risk ratio=0.30, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.57) compared with control groups. Fatigue outcome was not included. Heterogeneity was substantial, and GRADE evidence was very low for both QOL and pain.
CONCLUSIONS:Acupuncture could benefit patients with advanced cancer and is considered safe compared with usual care. However, the evidence regarding QOL and pain outcomes requires further validation. It is crucial to encourage the development of high-quality studies to strengthen this evidence. (Registry No. CRD42023423539).
