Prognostic analysis of laparoscopic simultaneous radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy.
- Author:
Shenmo LI
1
;
Dandan SU
1
;
Jiyu LIN
1
;
Haodong SONG
1
;
Lulin MA
1
;
Xiaofei HOU
1
;
Guoliang WANG
1
;
Hongxian ZHANG
1
;
Jianfei YE
1
;
Shudong ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bladder cancer;
Nephroureterectomy;
Radical cystectomy;
Survival analysis;
Upper urinary tract uroepithelial carcinoma
- MeSH:
Humans;
Laparoscopy/methods*;
Nephroureterectomy/methods*;
Cystectomy/methods*;
Prognosis;
Male;
Retrospective Studies;
Female;
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality*;
Middle Aged;
Aged
- From:
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)
2025;57(5):961-966
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the safety and prognostic factors influencing the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) combined with bladder cancer (BCa) by laparoscopic simultaneous radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy (RCNU).
METHODS:The clinical data of patients admitted to Peking University Third Hospital for laparoscopic RCNU surgery from January 2009 to September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the same gender, age (±5 years), history of uroepithelial tumors, underlying diseases, T-stage, N-stage, M-stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, and body mass index (BMI) (±5), 34 patients with RCNU were matched 1 ∶1 with patients with bladder cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) alone. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate patient survival, and Cox proportional regression risk model was used to analyze clinical factors affecting prognosis.
RESULTS:Of the 68 patients enrolled, the follow-up rate was 100% with a median follow-up time of 27.0 (11.7, 60.2) months. Comparison of intraoperative conditions (including operation time, estimated intraoperative bleeding, intra-operative blood transfusion, etc.) between the two groups of patients showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Comparison of preoperative creatinine and postoperative creatinine between the two groups of patients showed significant differences (P < 0.05). The perioperative Clavien grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ complication rates were 2.9% (1/34) in the RC group and 5.9% (2/34) in the RCNU group. There was no significant difference in terms of perioperative complications between the two groups. Overall survival was significantly lower in the patients receiving RCNU compared with the matched group receiving RC alone (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis suggested that two factors, high N stage and high postoperative creatinine, were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients in the 2 groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION:The overall survival prognosis of patients undergoing RCNU surgery was worse compared with laparoscopic RC surgery alone during the same period. There was no clinically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and perioperative complications, and there were clinically significant differences in preoperative renal function and post-operative renal function.
