Association between weight-adjusted waist index and pain:A cross-sectional study
10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.027
- VernacularTitle:体重校正腰围指数与疼痛的相关性:一项横断面研究
- Author:
Huili LIU
1
;
Bei WEN
;
Xue BAI
;
Ming'an CHEN
;
Min LI
Author Information
1. 北京大学第三医院麻醉科,北京 100191
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pain;
Weight-adjusted waist index;
Obesity;
Cross-sectional study
- From:
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)
2025;57(1):178-184
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the relationship between the weight-adjusted waist index(WWI)and acute,subacute pain or chronic pain among American adults.Methods:There was a cross-sectional study.Data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES)con-cerning waist circumference,weight,pain status and covariates(age,gender,race,marital status,edu-cation level and income,physical activity,alcohol consumption,smoking status,and diabetes)were extracted for analysis.Multinomial Logistic regression was conducted across the three models to investi-gate the associations between WWI and acute,subacute and chronic pain.Model 1 did not involve any adjustments.Model 2 involved adjustments for age,gender,race,marital status,education level,and income.Model 3 was further adjusted for physical activity,alcohol consumption,smoking,and diabetes status.Results:This study involved 12 694 participants with an average age of(50.6±18.7)years.Among all the participants,9 614 people(75.74％)had no pain,870 people(6.85％)experienced acute pain,354 people(2.79％)suffered from subacute pain,and 1 856 people(14.62％)experienced chronic pain.The WWI of all the participants was(10.95±0.85)cm/√kg,divided into four groups based on quartiles:Group Q1(7.90-10.36)cm/√kg,group Q2(10.37-10.94)cm/√kg,group Q3(10.95-11.53)cm/√kg and group Q4(11.54-15.20)cm/√kg.With the increase of WWI,the analysis revealed a significant statistical difference in the participants'acute and chronic pain status(all P＜0.001).In Model 1,the prevalence of acute pain was lower in group Q2 and group Q4 compared with group Q1(group Q2:OR=0.765,95％CI:0.615-0.953,P=0.017;group Q4:OR=0.648,95％CI:0.503-0.835,P＜0.001).Compared with group Q1,the prevalence of chronic pain increased in group Q2,group Q3,and group Q4(group Q2:OR=1.365,95％CI:1.149-1.622,P＜0.001;group Q3:OR=1.291,95％CI:1.082-1.541,P=0.005;group Q4:OR=1.874,95％CI:1.579-2.224,P＜0.001).In Model 2,compared with group Q1,an increase in chronic pain preva-lence was still associated with an increase in WWI in other three groups(group Q2:OR=1.359,95％CI:1.137-1.624,P=0.001;group Q3:OR=1.260,95％CI:1.039-1.528,P=0.019;group Q4:OR=1.735,95％CI:1.413-2.132,P＜0.001).In Model 3,group Q4 had a 49.2％increased prevalence of chronic pain compared to group Q1(OR=1.492,95％CI:1.208-1.842,P＜0.001).However,in Models 2 and 3,no significant relationship was observed between acute pain and WWI(all P＞0.05).And none of the three models identified a significant association between subacute pain and WWI(all P＞0.05).Conclusion:For American adults,there was no significant correlation between WWI and acute pain or subacute pain.However,as WWI increases,so does the prevalence of chronic pain.Further validation of this conclusion through large-scale prospective studies is warranted.
