- Author:
Akiko MATSUMOTO
1
;
Ikumi ENDO
1
;
Etsuko IJIMA
2
;
Akimasa HIRATA
3
;
Sachiko KODERA
3
;
Masayoshi ICHIBA
1
;
Mikiko TOKIYA
1
;
Takashi HIKAGE
4
;
Hiroshi MASUDA
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: 5G; Quasi-millimeter waves; Stress response biomarkers; Temperature; Whole-body exposure
- MeSH: Animals; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Male; Restraint, Physical; Stress, Physiological/radiation effects*; Corticosterone/blood*; Biomarkers/blood*; Microwaves/adverse effects*
- From:Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2025;30():33-33
- CountryJapan
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:In response to growing concerns about the health effects of quasi-millimeter waves (qMMW) used in 5th-generation wireless systems, conservative whole-body exposure thresholds based on indirect evidence have been proposed. The guidelines define a whole-body average specific absorption rate (WBA-SAR) of 4 W/kg which causes a 1 °C increase in core temperature, as the operational threshold for adverse health effects. To address the lack of direct evidence, we recently reported that a 30-minute exposure to qMMW at 4.6 W/kg resulted in a 1 °C increase in rat core temperature. Here, we further analyzed the near-threshold stress response for the first time, using biological samples from the aforementioned and additional experiments.
METHODS:A total of 59 young Sprague-Dawley rats (240-322 g) were exposed to 28 GHz for 40 minutes at WBA-SARs of 0, 3.7, and 7.2 W/kg, under normal (22.5 °C, 45-55% humidity), and heat (32 °C, 70% humidity) conditions. Rats were restrained in acrylic holders for dose control. We repeatedly measured serum and urinary biomarkers of stress response, aggregated the data, and analyzed them using a single statistical mixed model to subtract the effects of sham exposure and between-subject variation.
RESULTS:Sham exposure induced stress responses, suggesting an effect of restraint. After the subtraction of the sham exposure effect, 28 GHz appeared to induce stress responses as evidenced by elevated serum-free corticosterone 1 or 3 days after the exposure, which was more evident in animals with a change in rectal temperature exceeding 1 °C. Urinary-free catecholamines demonstrated an inhibitory property of 28 GHz frequency exposure on the stress response as evidenced by noradrenaline on the day of exposure. Heat exposure enhanced this effect, suggesting a possible role of noradrenaline in heat dissipation by promoting cutaneous blood flow, a notion supported by the correlation between noradrenaline levels and tail surface temperature, a critical organ for heat dissipation.
CONCLUSIONS:This study is the first to demonstrate that qMMW whole-body exposure can alter the stress response as indicated by corticosterone and noradrenaline at near-threshold levels. Our findings may provide insight into the biological basis of the whole-body exposure thresholds in the international guidelines.

