Application of mindfulness-based stress reduction on the patients treated with image fusion-guided prostate biopsy.
- Author:
Qiang JI
1
;
Jun HU
2
;
Xiao-Hong WANG
1
;
Yun LI
1
;
Fan WANG
1
;
Jie LIU
1
;
Hui-Xian WEI
1
;
Ying-Chun HUANG
1
;
Ying LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
2. Department of Urology, Third People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224001, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy； prostate biopsy； prostate cancer； image fusion
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Mindfulness;
Prostate/pathology*;
Image-Guided Biopsy;
Stress, Psychological/therapy*;
Middle Aged;
Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology*;
Aged
- From:
National Journal of Andrology
2025;31(9):812-817
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the application effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) therapy on the patients treated with image fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
METHODS:A total of 160 patients who underwent image fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy in the Urology Department from April 2023 to April 2024 were included. Patients were randomly assigned to a control group and an observation group, with 80 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the observation group received combined MBSR on the basis of routine care. The surgical indicators, pain levels, psychological states, nursing satisfaction, and postoperative complication rates of both groups were compared.
RESULTS:There was no statistically significant difference in general personal information and clinical data between the two groups（P>0.05）. The surgery duration, secondary fusion rate, and postoperative complication rate in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (［23.54±2.07］min vs ［26.25±1.69］min, P<0.05； 8.75% vs 22.50%, P=0.017； 17% vs 29%, P=0.036), and nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group than in the control group ( 77% vs 69%, P=0.025). The VAS scores biopsy (5.11±0.93 vs 6.27±1.32, P=0.041), discharge (0.74±0.67 vs 1.85±0.95, P=0.004), and scores of SDS (47.76±2.06 vs 50.46±2.07, P=0.009) and SAS (46.89±2.68 vs 49.75±2.83, P=0.031) in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group.
CONCLUSION:The application of MBSR in image fusion-guided prostate biopsy can synergistically utilize the advantages of minimally invasive technology, significantly optimize surgical indicators, and improve patients' psychological experiences, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
